Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11222662›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2001

Differential expression of synaptic and nonsynaptic mechanisms underlying stimulus-induced gamma oscillations in vitro.

M A Whittington, H C Doheny, R D Traub, F E LeBeau, E H Buhl

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Amygdalocortical circuitry in schizophrenia: from circuits to molecules.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2010
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Circuitry-based gene expression profiles in GABA cells of the trisynaptic pathway in schizophrenics versus bipolars.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2008
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Stimulus-dependent oscillations and evoked potentials in chinchilla auditory cortex.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2008
    Article
  11. Gamma oscillatory firing reveals distinct populations of pyramidal cells in the CA1 region of the hippocampus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2008
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Self-organized synaptic plasticity contributes to the shaping of gamma and beta oscillations in vitro.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2001
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M A WhittingtonSchool of Biomedical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9NL, United Kingdom.m.a.whittington@leeds.ac.uk
H C Doheny
R D Traub
F E LeBeau
E H Buhl
University of Leeds · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gamma frequency oscillations occur in hippocampus in vitro after brief tetani delivered to afferent pathways. Previous reports have characterized these oscillations as either (1) trains of GABA(A) inhibitory synaptic events mediated by depolarization of both pyramidal cells and interneurons at least in part mediated by metabotropic glutamate and acetylcholine receptors, or (2) field potential oscillations occurring in the near absence of an inhibitory synaptic oscillation when cells are driven by depolarizing GABA responses and local synchrony is produced by field effects. The aim of this study was to investigate factors involved in the differential expression of these synaptically and nonsynaptically gated oscillations. Field effects were undetectable in control recordings but manifested when slices were perfused with hypo-osmotic solutions or a reduced level of normal perfusate. These manipulations also reduced the amplitude of the train of inhibitory synaptic events associated with an oscillation and enhanced the depolarizing GABA component underlying the post-tetanic depolarization. The resulting field oscillation was still dependent, at least in part, on inhibitory synaptic transmission, but spatiotemporal aspects of the oscillation were severely disrupted. These changes were also accompanied by an increase in estimated [K(+)](o) compared with control. We suggest that nonsynaptic oscillations occur under conditions also associated with epileptiform activity and constitute a phenomenon that is distinct from synaptically gated oscillations. The latter remain a viable model for in vivo oscillations of cognitive relevance.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsBiological ClocksElectric StimulationExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsGABA Antagonistsgamma-Aminobutyric AcidHippocampusInterneuronsIn Vitro TechniquesMaleNeural InhibitionOsmolar ConcentrationPerfusionPiperazinesPotassiumBP 554GABA Antagonistsgamma-Aminobutyric AcidPiperazinesPotassiumSerotonin Receptor Agonists

Identifiers

PMID11222662
PMCPMC6762952
OpenAlexW2167859804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.