ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2001
Limitations of chromosome classification by multicolor karyotyping.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Genetic test results and one-year developmental outcomes of fetuses with congenital heart disease.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Conventional and Spectral Karyotyping of Murine Cerebellar Granule Neuron Progenitors.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- halSynteny: a fast, easy-to-use conserved synteny block construction method for multiple whole-genome alignments.GigaScience · 2020Article
- Segmentation of multicolor fluorescenceJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2017Article
- Article
- A novel approach for efficient extrication of overlapping chromosomes in automated karyotyping.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2013Article
- Multi-Color Spectral Transcript Analysis (SPECTRA) for Phenotypic Characterization of Tumor Cells.Biomolecules · 2013Article
- Classification of multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization (M-FISH) images with sparse representation.IEEE transactions on nanobioscience · 2012Article
- Spectral Karyotyping for identification of constitutional chromosomal abnormalities at a national reference laboratory.Molecular cytogenetics · 2012Article
- An analysis of complex chromosomal aberrations in seven cases of myelodysplastic syndromes by M-FISH and whole chromosome painting.International journal of hematology · 2008Article
- Concurrent translocation of BCL2 and MYC with a single immunoglobulin locus in high-grade B-cell lymphomas.Leukemia · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multicolor karyotyping technologies, such as spectral karyotyping (SKY) (Schröck et al.1996; Liyanage et al. 1996) and multiplex (M-) FISH (Speicher et al. 1996), have proved to be extremely useful in prenatal, postnatal, and cancer cytogenetics. However, these technologies have inherent limitations that, in certain situations, may result in chromosomal misclassification. In this report, we present nine cases, which fall into five categories, in which multicolor karyotyping has produced erroneous interpretations. Most errors appear to have a similar mechanistic basis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.