ReviewDrugs2001
The emerging roles of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in antiretroviral therapy.
Review in Drugs, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of rilpivirine in treatment-naive, HIV-1-infected patients with hepatitis B virus/hepatitis C virus coinfection enrolled in the Phase III randomized, double-blind ECHO and THRIVE trials.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2012Trial
- Towards discovering dual functional inhibitors against both wild type and K103N mutant HIV-1 reverse transcriptases: molecular docking and QSAR studies on 4,1-benzoxazepinone analogues.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2006Article
- TMC125, a novel next-generation nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor active against nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2004Article
- Effects of drug resistance mutations L100I and V106A on the binding of pyrrolobenzoxazepinone nonnucleoside inhibitors to the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase catalytic complex.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2004Article
- Antiretroviral Therapy-associated Serious and Life-threatening Toxicities.Current infectious disease reports · 2003Article
- Nelfinavir and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based salvage regimens in heavily HIV pretreated patients.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The availability of potent non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based regimens for antiretroviral therapy and concerns regarding protease inhibitor (PI)-related metabolic disturbances have led to significant shifts in treatment practices in HIV infection. NNRTI-based regimens may have several advantages over PI-based therapy for initial or prolonged therapy, including more convenient administration regimens, lower tablet volume, fewer drug interactions, and central nervous system penetration. No data from prospective clinical trials currently exist comparing the 3 approved agents (efavirenz, nevirapine or delavirdine). Both efavirenz and nevirapine have been compared to triple therapy with the PI indinavir over 48 weeks as initial therapy, with similar responses being observed with nevirapine regimens and superiority observed with efavirenz. A smaller 24-week study has suggested nevirapine may be superior to the PI nelfinavir. Limited comparative data in patients with high viral loads treated with nevirapine- or delavirdine-based regimens currently exist. However, cohort data and selected patient data from clinical trials suggest comparable activity to PI-based regimens in these patients. The superiority of efavirenz over indinavir-based regimens has been observed in comparative data in a subset of patients with high viral loads. In treatment-experienced patients, available uncontrolled data suggest these agents contribute to regimen efficacy in NNRTI-naïve, treatment-experienced patients. Efavirenz has demonstrated superiority over nelfinavir in nucleoside-experienced patients, although combining these 2 agents may represent the best approach in these circumstances. The tolerability of NNRTIs appears generally good with few individuals discontinuing in clinical studies as a result of adverse drug events. The majority of adverse events with NNRTIs occur within the first month, and are predictable and manageable without therapy interruption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.