Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11211856›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2000

Debate: Albumin administration should be avoided in the critically ill.

T B Pulimood, G R Park

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Recommendations for the use of albumin and immunoglobulins.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2009
    Guideline
  2. Plasma colloid osmotic pressure in healthy infants.Critical care (London, England) · 2001
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Role of albumin infusion in cirrhosis-associated complications.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Peptide derivedHeliyon · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Heparin Resistance During Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Adult Cardiac Surgery.Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia · 2022
    Review
  18. Albumin as a Biomaterial and Therapeutic Agent in Regenerative Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Noncalcific Mechanisms of Bioprosthetic Structural Valve Degeneration.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

T B PulimoodJohn Farman Intensive Care Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hill's Road, Cambridge, UK.
G R Park
Addenbrooke's Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The benefit of albumin administration in the critically ill patient is unproven. Epidemiological evidence suggests that there is an increase in death among patients with burns, hypoalbuminaemia, and hypotension treated with human albumin solution (HAS). In critical illness, hypoalbuminaemia is a result of transcapillary leak, decreased synthesis, large volume body fluid losses, and dilution caused by fluid resuscitation. When treating patients with hypoalbuminaemia, efforts must be centred around correction of the underlying disorder rather than reversal of hypoalbuminaemia. Problems with using albumin arise because it is an expensive blood product, and can result in systemic changes that include cardiovascular, haematological, renal, pulmonary, and immunological effects.

Indexed as

AlbuminsEvidence-Based MedicinePatient SelectionCritical IllnessHumansInfusions, IntravenousMeta-Analysis as TopicMetabolic Clearance RatePractice Guidelines as TopicTreatment OutcomeAlbumins

Identifiers

PMID11211856
PMCPMC137253
OpenAlexW1548753216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.