ArticleAmerican journal of public health2001
The new battleground: California's experience with smoke-free bars.
Article in American journal of public health, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Review of the quality of studies on the economic effects of smoke-free policies on the hospitality industry.Tobacco control · 2003Pooled it
- Effect of smoke-free workplaces on smoking behaviour: systematic review.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2002Pooled it
- Advocacy counterstrategies to tobacco industry interference in policymaking: a scoping review of peer-reviewed literature.Globalization and health · 2023Article
- Securing Smokefree Laws Covering Casinos and Bars in Louisiana via Messaging, Continuous Campaigning and Health Coalitions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Tobacco control law implementation in a middle-income country: Transnational tobacco control network overcoming tobacco industry opposition in Colombia.Global public health · 2018Article
- Weighing in: the taste-engineering frame in obesity expert discourse.American journal of public health · 2015Article
- Failure of policy regarding smoke-free bars in the Netherlands.European journal of public health · 2013Article
- Putting a Face on the Issue: Corporate Stakeholder Mobilization in Professional Grassroots Lobbying Campaigns.Business and society · 2012Article
- Comprehensive smoke-free policies attract more support from smokers in Europe than partial policies.European journal of public health · 2012Article
- Changes in smoking-related norms in bars resulting from California's Smoke-Free Workplace Act.Journal of drug education · 2012Article
- Prevalence and predictors of smoking in "smoke-free" bars. Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Europe Surveys.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2011Article
- Local smoke-free policy development in Santa Fe, Argentina.Tobacco control · 2010Article
- CHALLENGES TO IMPLEMENTING AND ENFORCING CALIFORNIA'S SMOKE-FREE WORKPLACE ACT IN BARS.Drugs (Abingdon, England) · 2009Article
- Cultural factors related to smoking in San Francisco's Irish bars.Journal of drug education · 2009Article
- Smokefree environments in Latin America: on the road to real change?Prevention and control : the official journal of the World Heart Federation · 2008Article
- "Accommodating" smoke-free policies: tobacco industry's Courtesy of Choice programme in Latin America.Tobacco control · 2007Review
- A pilot qualitative study of New Zealand policymakers' knowledge of, and attitudes to, the tobacco industry.Australia and New Zealand health policy · 2007Article
- Tobacco free workplace policies and low socioeconomic status female bartenders in San Francisco.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2006Article
- Tobacco industry consumer research on socially acceptable cigarettes.Tobacco control · 2005Review
- Free nicotine replacement therapy programs vs implementing smoke-free workplaces: a cost-effectiveness comparison.American journal of public health · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study examined the tobacco industry's tactics in the political, grassroots, and media arenas in attempting to subvert California's smoke-free bar law, and the efforts of health advocates to uphold and promote the law by using the same 3 channels.
methodsInterviews with key informants involved in the development and implementation of the smoke-free bar law were conducted. Information was gathered from bill analyses, internal memoranda, tobacco industry documents, media articles, and press releases.
resultsThe tobacco industry worked both inside the legislature and through a public relations campaign to attempt to delay implementation of the law and to encourage noncompliance once the law was in effect. Health groups were able to uphold the law by framing the law as a health and worker safety issue. The health groups were less successful in pressing the state to implement the law.
conclusionsIt is possible to enact and defend smoke-free bar laws, but doing so requires a substantial and sustained commitment by health advocates. The tobacco industry will fight this latest generation of clean indoor air laws even more aggressively than general workplace laws.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.