ArticleSozial- und Praventivmedizin2000
[Reproducibility of a German scale for assessing the need for inpatient treatment in surgery].
Article in Sozial- und Praventivmedizin, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During the past years, the assessment of the appropriateness of hospital utilization has become increasingly important in the German health care system. Previous evaluations by regional review organizations in several states demonstrated the need for a standardized, reliable, and valid instrument to evaluate the appropriateness of inpatient care. Objective of the study is to test the reliability of a German adaptation of the "Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol" (AEP). Among all 2672 admissions from the department of surgery of a regional medical center during one calendar year, 54 patients were randomly selected to evaluate the inter-rater reliability and 51 patients to test intra-rater reliability. Overall agreement, specific agreement and Kappa statistics were estimated for every hospital admissions and all consecutive hospital days. The German AEP showed an inter-rater agreement of 74% (62-86%) for hospital admissions (Kappa = 0.44) and 84% (79%-88%) for all hospital days (K = 0.55). Intra-rater reliability was 88% (79%-97%) for hospital admissions (K = 0.60) and 88% (85%-92%) for all hospital days (K = 0.70). The observed agreement is independent of length of hospital stay and proportion of appropriate days. A standardized instrument with known metric properties is essential for quality management in hospitals to prepare for an increasingly consolidating health care market in Germany. The German AEP is a reliable instrument, which will allow to identify inefficiencies in the management of surgical inpatients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
11210596What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.