ArticleThorax2001
Patient weighting of importance of asthma symptoms.
Article in Thorax, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Objective and Subjective Measurement of Cough in Asthma: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Lung · 2022Pooled it
- A Systematic and Critical Review of Discrete Choice Experiments in Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.The patient · 2022Pooled it
- Frequent cough in unsatisfactory controlled asthma--results from the population-based West Sweden Asthma study.Respiratory research · 2014Trial
- Attributes and levels in discrete choice experiments for pharmacy services: A systematic review to inform asthma intervention design.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2026Review
- Bronchial asthma: what is different in patients with and without chronic cough?Respiratory research & clinical practice · 2026Article
- Cross-country health inequality in the asthma burden: findings from the global burden of disease study 2021.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Assessment of cough in asthma patients attending clinic using the cough questionnaire for asthma (CQA).Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Article
- Cough in chronic lung disease: a state of the art review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Review
- Real-life effectiveness of indacaterol/glycopyrronium/mometasone for symptomatic relief of cough after switching from inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting βERJ open research · 2023Article
- Characteristics of different asthma phenotypes associated with cough: a prospective, multicenter survey in China.Respiratory research · 2022Article
- Physical activity end-points in trials of chronic respiratory diseases: summary of evidence.ERJ open research · 2022Review
- Is there clinical value in performing capsaicin cough challenges in patients with severe asthma?Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2021Article
- What matters to people with severe asthma? Exploring add-on asthma medication and outcomes of importance.ERJ open research · 2021Article
- Objective Assessment of Cough: An Early Marker of Response to Biological Therapies in Asthma?Lung · 2020Article
- Automatic Recognition, Segmentation, and Sex Assignment of Nocturnal Asthmatic Coughs and Cough Epochs in Smartphone Audio Recordings: Observational Field Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Characteristics of Asthma-related Nocturnal Cough: A Potential New Digital Biomarker.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2020Article
- Article
- Predictive value of respiratory symptoms for the diagnosis of pollen-induced seasonal asthma among children and adults in Inner Mongolia.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2017Article
- A Comparison of Methods for Capturing Patient Preferences for Delivery of Mental Health Services to Low-Income Hispanics Engaged in Primary Care.The patient · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundQuality of life measures are increasingly important in evaluating outcomes in asthma. If some asthma symptoms are more troublesome to patients than others, this may affect their contribution to outcome measures. This study was designed to assess the relative importance of common symptoms in adults with asthma.
methodsA postal survey using conjoint analysis was performed in 272 adults attending hospital outpatient clinics with moderately severe asthma. Patients were asked to chose between "symptom scenarios" offering different combinations of levels of five common asthma symptoms over one week. Two versions of the questionnaire were used with identical scenarios presenting symptoms in different orders. Different patients answered the two versions. Regression analysis was used to calculate symptom weights for daytime cough, breathlessness, wheeze and chest tightness, and sleep disturbance.
resultsSymptom order, percentage predicted peak expiratory flow (PEF), and symptoms in the week before the survey did not influence the choice of scenario. In both questionnaires patients were more likely to choose scenarios with low levels of cough and breathlessness than low sleep disturbance, wheeze or chest tightness. Regression weights for cough (-0.52) and breathlessness (-0.49) were twice those of wheeze (-0.25), chest tightness (-0.27), and sleep disturbance (-0.25). For 12% of patients cough dominated patient preferences, regardless of all other symptoms. Age was inversely related to weight given by patients to breathlessness.
conclusionsThe prominence of cough among other asthma symptoms was unexpected. Daytime cough and breathlessness had greater impact for patients than wheeze or sleep disturbance. Age influenced symptom burden, with younger patients giving greater weight to breathlessness than older patients. Conjoint analysis appears to be a useful method for establishing the relative importance of common symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.