Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11209053›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2001

Mitochondrial DNA sequences in ancient Australians: Implications for modern human origins.

G J Adcock, E S Dennis, S Easteal, G A Huttley, L S Jermiin, W J Peacock, A Thorne

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
13.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 225 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Toward high-resolution population genomics using archaeological samples.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2016
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Ancient mtDNA sequences from the First Australians revisited.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Introduction. Ancient DNA: the first three decades.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Evaluating Neanderthal genetics and phylogeny.Journal of molecular evolution · 2007
    Article
  17. Ancient DNA.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2005
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Evidence for a genetic discontinuity between Neandertals and 24,000-year-old anatomically modern Europeans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2003
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

G J AdcockResearch School of Pacific and Asian Studies and John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia.
E S Dennis
S Easteal
G A Huttley
L S Jermiin
W J Peacock
A Thorne
Australian National University · AUUniversity of Sydney · AUPlant Industry · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA from ancient human remains provides perspectives on the origin of our species and the relationship between molecular and morphological variation. We report analysis of mtDNA from the remains of 10 ancient Australians. These include the morphologically gracile Lake Mungo 3 [ approximately 60 thousand years (ka) before present] and three other gracile individuals from Holocene deposits at Willandra Lakes (<10 ka), all within the skeletal range of living Australians, and six Pleistocene/early Holocene individuals (15 to <8 ka) from Kow Swamp with robust morphologies outside the skeletal range of contemporary indigenous Australians. Lake Mungo 3 is the oldest (Pleistocene) "anatomically modern" human from whom DNA has been recovered. His mtDNA belonged to a lineage that only survives as a segment inserted into chromosome 11 of the nuclear genome, which is now widespread among human populations. This lineage probably diverged before the most recent common ancestor of contemporary human mitochondrial genomes. This timing of divergence implies that the deepest known mtDNA lineage from an anatomically modern human occurred in Australia; analysis restricted to living humans places the deepest branches in East Africa. The other ancient Australian individuals we examined have mtDNA sequences descended from the most recent common ancestor of living humans. Our results indicate that anatomically modern humans were present in Australia before the complete fixation of the mtDNA lineage now found in all living people. Sequences from additional ancient humans may further challenge current concepts of modern human origins.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAfrica, EasternAnimalsAustraliaBase SequenceChromosomes, Human, Pair 11DNA, MitochondrialEvolution, MolecularExtrachromosomal InheritanceFemaleFossilsGene FrequencyGenetics, PopulationHominidaeHumansLikelihood FunctionsDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID11209053
PMCPMC14622
OpenAlexW2107040819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.