ArticleThe Journal of physiology2001
Effect of extracellular Ca2+ on the quinine-activated current of bullfrog taste receptor cells.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The bitter substance quinine activates a cation current from the frog taste receptor cell. We have analysed the noise associated with this current, and the effect of extracellular Ca2+ on the current, using whole-cell recording on single dissociated cells. Quinine induced an inward current from the taste receptor cell near the resting potential. The response was accompanied by an increase in current fluctuations. From the variance/mean ratio of the quinine-activated current, the single-channel conductance was estimated to be 12 pS in the nominal absence of extracellular Ca2+. In the presence of 1.8 mM Ca2+, this conductance decreased to 5 pS. These values broadly agree with those previously obtained from excised, outside-out membrane patches. The dependence of the current on quinine concentration had a K1/2 of 0.48 mM in the absence of extracellular Ca2+, consistent with measurements from excised patches. The K1/2 value increased to 2.8 mM in 1.8 mM external Ca2+. The maximum current induced by quinine was also reduced by about 20% by Ca2+. The spectral power density distribution of the quinine-activated current could be described by the sum of two Lorentzian functions, with corner frequencies not substantially different in the absence and presence of 1.8 mM external Ca2+. The above results lend further support to the notion that the major component of the response of frog taste receptor cells to quinine comes from an ion channel directly activated by quinine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.