Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11205327›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2001

Hypermutation in bacteria and other cellular systems.

B A Bridges

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

B A BridgesMRC Cell Mutation Unit, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK. b.a.bridges@sussex.ac.uk
University of Sussex · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A temporary state of hypermutation can in principle arise through an increase in the rate of polymerase errors (which may or may not be triggered by template damage) and/or through abrogation of fidelity mechanisms such as proofreading and mismatch correction. In bacteria there are numerous examples of transient mutator states, often occurring as a consequence of stress. They may be targeted to certain regions of the DNA, for example by transcription or by recombination. The initial errors are made by various DNA polymerases which vary in their error-proneness: several are inducible and are under the control of the SOS system. There are several structurally related polymerases in mammals that have recently come to light and that have unusual properties, such as the ability to carry out 'accurate' translesion synthesis opposite sites of template damage or the possession of exceedingly high misincorporation rates. In bacteria the initial errors may be genuinely spontaneous polymerase errors or they may be triggered by damage to the template strand, for example as a result of attack by active oxidative species such as singlet oxygen. In mammalian cells, hypermutable states persisting for many generations have been shown to be induced by various agents, not all of them DNA damaging agents. A hypermutable state induced by ionizing radiation in male germ cells in the mouse results in a high rate of sequence errors in certain unstable minisatellite loci; the mechanism is unclear but believed to be associated with recombination events.

Indexed as

MutationAnimalsBacteriaDNA DamageEscherichia coliGene RearrangementGenome, BacterialMammalsSelection, GeneticSOS Response, GeneticsStress, PhysiologicalTranscription, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID11205327
PMCPMC1087688
OpenAlexW2081827752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.