Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11202238›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical immunology2000

Primary immunodeficiency diseases in Norway.

A Stray-Pedersen, T G Abrahamsen, S S Frøland

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical immunology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Prevalence and Incidence of Hereditary Angioedema: A Systematic Literature Review.International archives of allergy and immunology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A Review on Secondary Immune Thrombocytopenia in Malaysia.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A Stray-PedersenThe Centre for Rare Disorders, Department of Medicine, Rikshospitalet, University of Oslo, Norway.
T G Abrahamsen
S S Frøland

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study represents the first national epidemiological survey of primary immunodeficiency diseases in Norway. Uniform questionnaires were sent out in April 1998 to all hospital departments considered relevant. As of February 1999, a total of 372 patients have been registered, of whom 69 patients are deceased. With a population of 4.45 million people, the total prevalence of primary immunodeficiency diseases in Norway February 1, 1999 is 6.82 per 100000 inhabitants. Distribution between the main immunodeficiency diagnoses is (a) antibody deficiencies 50.8%, (b) combined deficiencies included other immunodeficiency syndromes 12.4%, (c) complement deficiencies 21.0%, (d) phagocytic disorders 6.7%, (e) and immunodeficiency associated with other congenital diseases 9. 1%. Compared to previous reports from other European countries, there is a smaller proportion of antibody deficiencies due to few IgA deficiencies registered and a large proportion of complement deficiencies due to many patients with hereditary angioedema.

Indexed as

AdultChildComplement System ProteinsFemaleHumansImmunoglobulinsImmunologic Deficiency SyndromesIncidenceInfant, NewbornInfant, Newborn, DiseasesMaleNorwayPhagocyte Bactericidal DysfunctionPrevalenceComplement System ProteinsImmunoglobulins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.