ArticleThe Histochemical journal2000
Immunoreactivity of six monoclonal antibodies directed against 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin-D3 receptors in human skin.
Article in The Histochemical journal, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of nuclear hormone receptors in cutaneous wound repair.Cell biochemistry and function · 2015Review
- Identification of the vitamin D receptor in various cells of the mouse kidney.Kidney international · 2012Article
- [The sebaceous gland].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2010Review
- Sebaceous gland receptors.Dermato-endocrinology · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Using confocal laser scanning microscopy, we tested the suitability of five monoclonal mouse antibodies (IVA7E7, IVB12G12, IVG9C11, VD2F12, and VIIID8C12) that had been raised against different domains of the porcine intestinal 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin-D3 receptor (VDR), for the immunohistological detection of VDR in human skin. The VDR immunoreactivity of these antibodies was compared with the well-characterized VDR-staining pattern of the mouse monoclonal antibody 9A7gamma raised against chick intestinal VDR. All six antibodies revealed strong nuclear and qualitatively similar immunoreactivity in all cell layers of the viable epidermis. Our data demonstrate that the five mouse monoclonal antibodies are suitable for immunohistochemical detection of VDR in frozen sections. These antibodies show comparable staining patterns in human skin even though they had been raised against different functional domains of the 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin-D3 receptor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.