Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11200306›Full record

ReviewDrugs & aging2000

Glycaemic control and hormone replacement therapy: implications of the Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestogen Intervention (PEPI) study.

S E Fineberg

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs & aging, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

S E FinebergIndiana University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Indianapolis 46202, USA. efineber@iupui.edu
Indiana University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite evidence that supports the beneficial effects of postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT), concerns remain about its possible adverse effects. However, entry into the postmenopausal state is associated with many characteristics of the insulin resistance syndrome, including increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, accretion of generalised and visceral adiposity and insulin resistance. Studies carried out in postmenopausal women have revealed that an increase in visceral obesity is associated with an increase in androgenicity that, in turn, is associated with type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Short term studies of HRT containing conjugated estrogens (CEE) and medroxyprogesterone (MPA) have shown prevention of the accretion of visceral fat. However, longer term studies using other techniques suggest that these effects may be evanescent. A few trials suggest that oral estrogen therapy reduces postmenopausal insulin resistance, as suggested by reductions in fasting insulin and glucose levels and an increase in glucose metabolism rates, whereas most studies do not show an adverse effect upon carbohydrate metabolism. MPA may decrease these beneficial effects. Transdermal estrogen is essentially neutral with regard to insulin sensitivity and oral estradiol (17beta-estradiol) may also be neutral or enhance sensitivity. Different progestogens vary in their effects upon carbohydrate metabolism. The Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestogen Intervention (PEPI) Study was a prospective, 3-year, randomised trial in 875 women that compared placebo, unopposed CEE, CEE plus continuous MPA, CEE plus cyclical MPA, and CEE plus cyclical micronised progesterone. Fasting insulin and glucose levels decreased significantly by 16.1% and 0.122 mmol/L, respectively, in all drug treatment groups. However, after a 75g glucose load, glucose levels at 2 hours increased by 0.33 mmol/L in the active treatment groups without a corresponding increase in insulin levels. No beneficial effects on waist/hip ratio could be demonstrated. Data from the PEPI trial also suggested that the maximum benefit regarding carbohydrate metabolism was achieved in patients who were the most hyperglycaemic and hyperinsulinaemic at the start of therapy. It can be concluded, therefore, that HRT has few, if any, harmful effects on carbohydrate metabolism and that it may be of benefit in women in modifying the long term complications of the postmenopausal state.

Indexed as

Estrogen Replacement TherapyAgedAnimalsBlood GlucoseBody CompositionCardiovascular DiseasesChemistry, PharmaceuticalDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2EstrogensFemaleHumansInsulinInsulin ResistanceProgestinsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTriglyceridesBlood GlucoseEstrogensInsulinProgestinsTriglycerides

Identifiers

PMID11200306
OpenAlexW65823784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.