Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11198338›Full record

ArticleAtencion primaria2000

[Comparison of primary care teams in Barcelona according to management formulas].

A Guarga, M Gil, M Pasarín, R Manzanera, R Armengol, J Sintes

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Atencion primaria, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Social determinants of prescribed and non-prescribed medicine use.International journal for equity in health · 2010
    Article
  5. [Primary care evaluation].Atencion primaria · 2009
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Benchmarking in organizations].Atencion primaria · 2005
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [Evaluation of primary health care].Atencion primaria · 2003
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A GuargaDirección de Planificación y Evaluación, Consorci Sanitari de Barcelona. aguarga@rsbcn.scs.es
M Gil
M Pasarín
R Manzanera
R Armengol
J Sintes

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of the study is to compare, among socio-economically similar areas, the use of medical services, clinical practice and pharmacy costs depending on the how the primary healthcare teams, that provide these services, are organized according to different managemental formulas.

designDescriptive study of the evaluation of health care services. PATIENTS AND

methodsThe population units (basic health areas) attended by the reformed primary health care services in Barcelona were classified into three levels according to the population's socioeconomic status (high, medium or low). For each level, two primary health care teams were selected representing different primary health care providers: "Institut Catala de la Salut"; and others. The influence of both the provision option and the population characteristics on service use, clinical practice and costs of prescription were compared. MAIN

resultsThe services offered by the two provision options differ. However, the use of medical services is related to the socioeconomic characteristics and not to the option for service provision. Whilst there are no relevant differences in clinical practice between the different options, we observed variations among different primary care teams, notably in referrals to specialists and influenza vaccine coverage. The greater source of variation in prescription costs seems to be related to an external confounding factor.

conclusionsEmpirical data have not identified relevant differences in the pattern of use, clinical practice, or costs between the different options for service provision within the model of reformed primary care services. Observed variations seem to be associated mainly with the population's characteristics, its pattern of health service use or other external confounding factors.

Indexed as

Clinical Laboratory TechniquesDrug PrescriptionsEfficiency, OrganizationalHealth Services Needs and DemandHome Care ServicesHumansPrimary Health CareSocioeconomic FactorsSpain

Identifiers

PMID11198338
PMCPMC7679633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.