ArticleAtencion primaria2000
[Comparison of primary care teams in Barcelona according to management formulas].
Article in Atencion primaria, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Public Service Motivation of the professionals of the primary care centers: What is more important the environment or the perceived supervisor support?]Atencion primaria · 2021Observational
- [Public, private or third sector management? Differences in the results in Primary Care in Catalonia].Atencion primaria · 2019Article
- [Primary health care teams management models according to the supplier and the effects on its dynamics in Catalonia].Revista espanola de salud publica · 2019Article
- Social determinants of prescribed and non-prescribed medicine use.International journal for equity in health · 2010Article
- [Primary care evaluation].Atencion primaria · 2009Article
- [Evaluation of the primary health care reform: preventive practices and inequalities].Atencion primaria · 2007Article
- [Factors determining flu vaccination in the over-65s].Atencion primaria · 2006Article
- [Rounding off the reform of primary health care: managing change in Barcelona, 1998-2003].Atencion primaria · 2005Article
- [Consensus on a process of benchmarking in primary care in Barcelona].Atencion primaria · 2005Article
- [Benchmarking in organizations].Atencion primaria · 2005Article
- [Results of a benchmarking exercise for primary care teams in Barcelona, Spain].Atencion primaria · 2005Article
- [Clinical management of consultations: clinical content and predictability (SyN-PC Study)].Atencion primaria · 2004Article
- [Evaluation of primary health care].Atencion primaria · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of the study is to compare, among socio-economically similar areas, the use of medical services, clinical practice and pharmacy costs depending on the how the primary healthcare teams, that provide these services, are organized according to different managemental formulas.
designDescriptive study of the evaluation of health care services. PATIENTS AND
methodsThe population units (basic health areas) attended by the reformed primary health care services in Barcelona were classified into three levels according to the population's socioeconomic status (high, medium or low). For each level, two primary health care teams were selected representing different primary health care providers: "Institut Catala de la Salut"; and others. The influence of both the provision option and the population characteristics on service use, clinical practice and costs of prescription were compared. MAIN
resultsThe services offered by the two provision options differ. However, the use of medical services is related to the socioeconomic characteristics and not to the option for service provision. Whilst there are no relevant differences in clinical practice between the different options, we observed variations among different primary care teams, notably in referrals to specialists and influenza vaccine coverage. The greater source of variation in prescription costs seems to be related to an external confounding factor.
conclusionsEmpirical data have not identified relevant differences in the pattern of use, clinical practice, or costs between the different options for service provision within the model of reformed primary care services. Observed variations seem to be associated mainly with the population's characteristics, its pattern of health service use or other external confounding factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.