Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11197533›Full record

ArticleJournal of anatomy2000

VEGF enhances intraneural angiogenesis and improves nerve regeneration after axotomy.

M I Hobson, C J Green, G Terenghi

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anatomy, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 103 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
103citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

103 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 297 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M I HobsonBlond McIndoe Laboratories, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, UK.
C J Green
G Terenghi
The Royal Free Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whilst there is an increased understanding of the cell biology of nerve regeneration, it remains unclear whether there is a direct interrelationship between vascularisation and efficacy of nerve regeneration within a nerve conduit. To establish this is important as in clinical surgery peripheral nerve conduit grafting has been widely investigated as a possible alternative to the use of nerve autografts. The aim of this study was to assess whether vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a highly specific endothelial cell mitogen, can enhance vascularisation and, indirectly, axonal regeneration within a silicone nerve regeneration chamber. Chambers containing VEGF (500-700 ng/ml) in a laminin-based gel (Matrigel) were inserted into 1 cm rat sciatic nerve defects and nerve regeneration examined in relation to angiogenesis between 5 and 180 d. Longitudinal sections were stained with antibodies against endothelial cells (RECA-1), axons (neurofilament) and Schwann cells (S-100) to follow the progression of vascular and neural elements. Computerised image analysis demonstrated that the addition of VEGF significantly increased blood vessel penetration within the chamber from d 5, and by d 10 this correlated with an increase of axonal regeneration and Schwann cell migration. The pattern of increased nerve regeneration due to VEGF administration was maintained up to 180 d, when myelinated axon counts were increased by 78 % compared with plain Matrigel control. Furthermore the dose-response of blood vessel regeneration to VEGF was clearly reflected in the increase of axonal regrowth and Schwann cell proliferation, indicating the close relationship between regenerating nerves and blood vessels within the chamber. Target organ reinnervation was enhanced by VEGF at 180 d as measured through the recovery of gastrocnemius muscle weights and footpad axonal terminal density, the latter showing a significant increase over controls (P < 0.05). The results demonstrate an overall relationship between increased vascularisation and enhanced nerve regeneration within an acellular conduit, and highlight the interdependence of the 2 processes.

Indexed as

AnimalsAxonsAxotomyDose-Response Relationship, DrugEndothelial Growth FactorsEndothelium, VascularImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImmunohistochemistryLymphokinesMaleModels, AnimalNeovascularization, PhysiologicNerve RegenerationRatsRats, Inbred LewSchwann CellsEndothelial Growth FactorsLymphokinesVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVascular Endothelial Growth Factors

Identifiers

PMID11197533
PMCPMC1468175
OpenAlexW1982542580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.