Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11196131›Full record

ArticleChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology2000

Analysis of replication timing at the FRA10B and FRA16B fragile site loci.

O Handt, E Baker, S Dayan, S M Gartler, E Woollatt, R I Richards, R S Hansen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

O HandtDepartment of Cytogenetics and Molecular Genetics, Women's and Children's Hospital, North Adelaide, Australia. ohandt@health.adelaide.edu.au
E Baker
S Dayan
S M Gartler
E Woollatt
R I Richards
R S Hansen
Women's and Children's Hospital · AUBoston Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

DOSAGE COMPENSATION IN MAMMALS: X-INACTIVATIONR01HD016659 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GARTLER, STANLEY · 1996 to 2004
$1.9M
REPLICATION ASYNCHRONY AND IMPRINTINGR01GM052463 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HANSEN, RALPH SCOTT · 1995 to 1999
–
DOSAGE COMPENSATION IN MAMMALS: X-INACTIVATIONR37HD016659 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GARTLER, STANLEY · 1986 to 1995
–
NICHD NIH HHS HD16659NIGMS NIH HHS GM52463
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The molecular basis for the cytogenetic appearance of chromosomal fragile sites is not yet understood. Late replication and further delay of replication at fragile sites expressing alleles has been observed for FRAXA, FRAXE and FRA3B fragile site loci. We analysed the timing of replication at the FRA10B and FRA16B loci to determine whether late replication is a feature which is shared by all fragile sites and, therefore, is a necessary condition for chromosomal fragile site expression. The FRA10B locus was located in a transitional region between early and late zones of replication. Fragile and non-fragile alleles exhibit a similar replication pattern proximal to the repeat but fragile alleles are delayed relative to non-fragile ones on the distal side. Although fragility at FRA10B appears to be caused by expansion of an AT-rich repeat in the region, replication time near the repeat was similar in fragile and non-fragile alleles. The FRA16B locus was late replicating and appeared to replicate even later on fragile chromosomes. While these observations are compatible with the hypothesis that delayed replication may play a role in fragile site expression, they suggest that replication delay may not need to occur at the expanded repeat region itself in order to be permissive for fragility.

Indexed as

AllelesCells, CulturedChromosome Fragile SitesChromosome FragilityDNA ReplicationFlow CytometryGenetic MarkersHeterozygoteHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceInterphaseLymphocytesPolymerase Chain ReactionRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidSequence Tagged SitesTime FactorsGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID11196131
OpenAlexW119566334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.