ER retention of soluble proteins: retrieval, retention, or both?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Late progamic phase and fertilization affect calreticulin expression in the Hyacinthus orientalis female gametophyte.Plant cell reports · 2015
   Article
2. Characterization of an endoplasmic reticulum-associated silaffin kinase from the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2010
   Article
3. Specific ER quality control components required for biogenesis of the plant innate immune receptor EFR.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2009
   Article
4. Secretory bulk flow of soluble proteins is efficient and COPII dependent.The Plant cell · 2001
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Protein quality control along the route to the plant vacuole.1997
• Comment on
  Protein recycling from the Golgi apparatus to the endoplasmic reticulum in plants and its minor contribution to calreticulin retention.2000

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as