Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11182707›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology

Assessment of ejection fraction with Tl-201 gated SPECT in myocardial infarction: Precision in a rest-redistribution study and accuracy versus planar angiography.

E Itti, J Rosso, P Damien, M Auffret, J P Thirion, M Meignan

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Variability of serial same-day left ventricular ejection fraction using quantitative gated SPECT.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology
    Trial
  2. Transient postischemic stunning evaluation by stress gated Tl-201 SPECT myocardial imaging: Effect on systolic left ventricular function.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

E IttiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Henri Mondor Hospital/Paris XII University, 51 av du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France. eitti@wanadoo.fr
J Rosso
P Damien
M Auffret
J P Thirion
M Meignan
Université Paris-Est Créteil · FRFondation Sophia Antipolis · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri-Mondor · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundViability and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) are essential measures for the assessment of myocardial infarction (MI). These 2 variables may be evaluated simultaneously by means of thallium-201 gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT); however, the precision and accuracy of LVEF measurements with this isotope remain controversial, particularly in cases of extended perfusion defects and poor count densities. METHODS AND

resultsFifty patients with a history of MI underwent a 20-minute rest and a 4-hour redistribution Tl-201 gated SPECT viability protocol, immediately followed by a technetium-99m planar equilibrium radionuclide angiography (ERNA). On gated SPECT images, various count statistics were calculated, and perfusion was automatically quantified by means of CardioMatch, which provided both the size and severity of MI defects. Rest and redistribution LVEFs were determined from gated SPECT with Germano's algorithm, whereas LVEFs were calculated from ERNA using the manufacturer's software. Mean LVEF values calculated with rest gated SPECT, redistribution gated SPECT, and planar ERNA were 30% +/- 13%, 30% +/- 13% and 33% +/- 13%, respectively. Significant differences between repeated gated SPECT LVEFs were not shown by means of the paired t test. Correlation coefficients were high between 20-minute and 4-hour scans (r = 0.89) and between gated SPECT and ERNA (r = 0.88 and r = 0.92 at 20 minutes and 4 hours, respectively). Additionally, close agreement between gated SPECT and ERNA was shown by means of the Bland-Altman plot, despite an underestimation of 3 units. Finally, neither the technical conditions (count density, heart rate, lung uptake, etc) nor the perfusion alteration (size, severity, redistribution) appeared to interfere with the precision and accuracy of gated SPECT LVEF measurement.

conclusionTl-201 gated SPECT is a precise method for assessing LVEF within the same patient at 4-hour intervals, even with a substantial count decay, and it gives accurate results compared with planar ERNA, even in the case of large perfusion defects.

Indexed as

Gated Blood-Pool ImagingStroke VolumeThallium RadioisotopesTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonAdultAgedCoronary CirculationHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionRegression AnalysisReproducibility of ResultsRestVentricular Function, LeftThallium Radioisotopes

Identifiers

PMID11182707
OpenAlexW2043144081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.