Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11181995›Full record

ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)2001

The sequence of the human genome.

J C Venter, M D Adams, E W Myers, P W Li, R J Mural, G G Sutton, H O Smith, M Yandell, C A Evans, R A Holt and 264 more

Erratum issued 3 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3,555 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3,555citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
434.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00018889 recruitingnot on this map

Phenotype/Genotype Correlations in Movement Disorders

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)Ran2001Enrolled2,500ConditionsMovement Disorder
NCT02075151 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Bronchial Thermoplasty: Mechanism of Action and Defining Asthma Phenotype

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational University Hospital, SingaporeRan2014 to 2018Enrolled50ConditionsAsthmaArmsBronchial Thermoplasty
NCT02927158 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Use of Whole Exome Sequencing/Whole Genome Sequencing in the Plain Communities

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2016 to 2040Enrolled300ConditionsUndiagnosed Disease
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3,555 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13,619 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Cross-species incompatibilities offer new insights into the functional consequences of satellite DNA evolution.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. AcutebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Angiogenic Doping: Plausible Yet Difficult to Detect.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The Encyclopedia of DNA Elements.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article

3,495 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

274 authors at 11 institutions in 3 countries.

J C VenterCelera Genomics, 45 West Gude Drive, Rockville, MD 20850, USA. humangenome@celera.com
M D Adams
E W Myers
P W Li
R J Mural
G G Sutton
H O Smith
M Yandell
C A Evans
R A Holt
J D Gocayne
P Amanatides
R M Ballew
D H Huson
J R Wortman
Q Zhang
C D Kodira
X H Zheng
L Chen
M Skupski
G Subramanian
P D Thomas
J Zhang
G L Gabor Miklos
C Nelson
S Broder
A G Clark
J Nadeau
V A McKusick
N Zinder
A J Levine
R J Roberts
M Simon
C Slayman
M Hunkapiller
R Bolanos
A Delcher
I Dew
D Fasulo
M Flanigan
L Florea
A Halpern
S Hannenhalli
S Kravitz
S Levy
C Mobarry
K Reinert
K Remington
J Abu-Threideh
E Beasley
K Biddick
V Bonazzi
R Brandon
M Cargill
I Chandramouliswaran
R Charlab
K Chaturvedi
Z Deng
V Di Francesco
P Dunn
K Eilbeck
C Evangelista
A E Gabrielian
W Gan
W Ge
F Gong
Z Gu
P Guan
T J Heiman
M E Higgins
R R Ji
Z Ke
K A Ketchum
Z Lai
Y Lei
Z Li
J Li
Y Liang
X Lin
F Lu
G V Merkulov
N Milshina
H M Moore
A K Naik
V A Narayan
B Neelam
D Nusskern
D B Rusch
S Salzberg
W Shao
B Shue
J Sun
Z Wang
A Wang
X Wang
J Wang
M Wei
R Wides
C Xiao
C Yan
A Yao
J Ye
M Zhan
W Zhang
H Zhang
Q Zhao
L Zheng
F Zhong
W Zhong
S Zhu
S Zhao
D Gilbert
S Baumhueter
G Spier
C Carter
A Cravchik
T Woodage
F Ali
H An
A Awe
D Baldwin
H Baden
M Barnstead
I Barrow
K Beeson
D Busam
A Carver
A Center
M L Cheng
L Curry
S Danaher
L Davenport
R Desilets
S Dietz
K Dodson
L Doup
S Ferriera
N Garg
A Gluecksmann
B Hart
J Haynes
C Haynes
C Heiner
S Hladun
D Hostin
J Houck
T Howland
C Ibegwam
J Johnson
F Kalush
L Kline
S Koduru
A Love
F Mann
D May
S McCawley
T McIntosh
I McMullen
M Moy
L Moy
B Murphy
K Nelson
C Pfannkoch
E Pratts
V Puri
H Qureshi
M Reardon
R Rodriguez
Y H Rogers
D Romblad
B Ruhfel
R Scott
C Sitter
M Smallwood
E Stewart
R Strong
E Suh
R Thomas
N N Tint
S Tse
C Vech
G Wang
J Wetter
S Williams
M Williams
S Windsor
E Winn-Deen
K Wolfe
J Zaveri
K Zaveri
J F Abril
R Guigó
M J Campbell
K V Sjolander
B Karlak
A Kejariwal
H Mi
B Lazareva
T Hatton
A Narechania
K Diemer
A Muruganujan
N Guo
S Sato
V Bafna
S Istrail
R Lippert
R Schwartz
B Walenz
S Yooseph
D Allen
A Basu
J Baxendale
L Blick
M Caminha
J Carnes-Stine
P Caulk
Y H Chiang
M Coyne
C Dahlke
A Deslattes Mays
M Dombroski
M Donnelly
D Ely
S Esparham
C Fosler
H Gire
S Glanowski
K Glasser
A Glodek
M Gorokhov
K Graham
B Gropman
M Harris
J Heil
S Henderson
J Hoover
D Jennings
C Jordan
J Jordan
J Kasha
L Kagan
C Kraft
A Levitsky
M Lewis
X Liu
J Lopez
D Ma
W Majoros
J McDaniel
S Murphy
M Newman
T Nguyen
N Nguyen
M Nodell
S Pan
J Peck
M Peterson
W Rowe
R Sanders
J Scott
M Simpson
T Smith
A Sprague
T Stockwell
R Turner
E Venter
M Wang
M Wen
D Wu
M Wu
A Xia
A Zandieh
X Zhu
Universitat Pompeu Fabra · ESRockefeller University · USBar-Ilan University · ILCalifornia Institute of Technology · USCase Western Reserve University · USJohns Hopkins University · USNew England Biolabs (United States) · USPacific Engineering (United States) · USPennsylvania State University · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A 2.91-billion base pair (bp) consensus sequence of the euchromatic portion of the human genome was generated by the whole-genome shotgun sequencing method. The 14.8-billion bp DNA sequence was generated over 9 months from 27,271,853 high-quality sequence reads (5.11-fold coverage of the genome) from both ends of plasmid clones made from the DNA of five individuals. Two assembly strategies-a whole-genome assembly and a regional chromosome assembly-were used, each combining sequence data from Celera and the publicly funded genome effort. The public data were shredded into 550-bp segments to create a 2.9-fold coverage of those genome regions that had been sequenced, without including biases inherent in the cloning and assembly procedure used by the publicly funded group. This brought the effective coverage in the assemblies to eightfold, reducing the number and size of gaps in the final assembly over what would be obtained with 5.11-fold coverage. The two assembly strategies yielded very similar results that largely agree with independent mapping data. The assemblies effectively cover the euchromatic regions of the human chromosomes. More than 90% of the genome is in scaffold assemblies of 100,000 bp or more, and 25% of the genome is in scaffolds of 10 million bp or larger. Analysis of the genome sequence revealed 26,588 protein-encoding transcripts for which there was strong corroborating evidence and an additional approximately 12,000 computationally derived genes with mouse matches or other weak supporting evidence. Although gene-dense clusters are obvious, almost half the genes are dispersed in low G+C sequence separated by large tracts of apparently noncoding sequence. Only 1.1% of the genome is spanned by exons, whereas 24% is in introns, with 75% of the genome being intergenic DNA. Duplications of segmental blocks, ranging in size up to chromosomal lengths, are abundant throughout the genome and reveal a complex evolutionary history. Comparative genomic analysis indicates vertebrate expansions of genes associated with neuronal function, with tissue-specific developmental regulation, and with the hemostasis and immune systems. DNA sequence comparisons between the consensus sequence and publicly funded genome data provided locations of 2.1 million single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). A random pair of human haploid genomes differed at a rate of 1 bp per 1250 on average, but there was marked heterogeneity in the level of polymorphism across the genome. Less than 1% of all SNPs resulted in variation in proteins, but the task of determining which SNPs have functional consequences remains an open challenge.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanHuman Genome ProjectSequence Analysis, DNAAlgorithmsAnimalsChromosome BandingChromosome MappingChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialComputational BiologyConsensus SequenceCpG IslandsDatabases, FactualDNA, IntergenicEvolution, MolecularExonsFemaleDNA, IntergenicProteinsRetroelements

Identifiers

PMID11181995
OpenAlexW2127230663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.