Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11179227›Full record

ArticleThe EMBO journal2001

DNA sequence-dependent folding determines the divergence in binding specificities between Maf and other bZIP proteins.

M Dlakić, A V Grinberg, D A Leonard, T K Kerppola

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The EMBO journal, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M DlakićHoward Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Biological Chemistry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0650, USA.
A V Grinberg
D A Leonard
T K Kerppola

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maf family transcription factors are atypical basic region-leucine zipper (bZIP) proteins that contain a variant basic region and an ancillary DNA-binding region. These proteins recognize extended DNA sequence elements flanking the core recognition element bound by canonical bZIP proteins. We have investigated the causes for the differences in DNA recognition between Maf and other bZIP family proteins through studies of Maf secondary structure, trypsin sensitivity, binding affinity, dissociation rate and DNA contacts. Our results show that specific DNA binding by Maf is coupled to a conformational change involving both the basic and ancillary DNA-binding regions that depends on the extended DNA sequence elements. Two basic region amino acid residues that differ between Maf and canonical bZIP proteins facilitate the conformational change required for Maf recognition of the extended elements. Nucleotide base contacts made by Maf differ from those made by canonical bZIP proteins. Taken together, our results suggest that the unusual DNA binding specificity of Maf family proteins is mediated by concerted folding of structurally unrelated DNA recognition motifs.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceBacterial ProteinsBase SequenceBasic-Leucine Zipper Transcription FactorsBinding SitesDNADNA-Binding ProteinsDNA FootprintingG-Box Binding FactorsMolecular Sequence DataOligodeoxyribonucleotidesProtein ConformationProtein FoldingSequence Homology, Amino AcidTranscription FactorsBacterial ProteinsBasic-Leucine Zipper Transcription FactorsDNADNA-Binding ProteinsG-Box Binding FactorsMaf protein, Bacillus subtilisOligodeoxyribonucleotidesTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID11179227
PMCPMC145405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.