ArticleCurrent infectious disease reports2001
Influence of Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Principles on Antibiotic Selection.
Article in Current infectious disease reports, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacokinetics of sarafloxacin in allogynogenetic silver crucian carp, Carassius auratus gibelio.Fish physiology and biochemistry · 2016Article
- Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling of norvancomycin.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2008Article
- Pharmacodynamic activity of telithromycin at simulated clinically achievable free-drug concentrations in serum and epithelial lining fluid against efflux (mefE)-producing macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae for which telithromycin MICs vary.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2005Article
- [Guidelines for the management of community pneumonia in adult who needs hospitalization].Medicina intensiva · 2005Article
- New developments in antibacterial choice for lower respiratory tract infections in elderly patients.Drugs & aging · 2004Review
- The ketolides: a critical review.Drugs · 2002Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When evaluating the efficacy of antibiotics for the treatment of respiratory tract infections, such as community acquired pneumonia and acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, assessment of clinical cure may not be the most relevant parameter, as it may not be related to microbiological eradication or to the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the infecting pathogen. It is more relevant to study the efficacy of the antibiotic in eradicating the bacterial pathogen, because this is frequently related to both the MIC of the pathogen and the antibiotic dosage regimen. Pharmacodynamics correlates the concentration of antibiotic in the blood or at the infection site with its biological effect against the organism (bacteriological eradication). For beta-lactams, the pharmacodynamic parameter that best correlates with eradication is time (T) above MIC (T > MIC); for aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones, it is the area under the curve at 24 hours (AUC(24))-to-MIC ratio (AUC(24)/MIC). Knowledge of pharmacodynamics allows optimum use of antibiotics; in vitro models, animal models, and retrospective and prospective clinical trials have shown that the use of such knowledge optimizes bacteriological eradication and enhances patient outcome. In the future, pharmacodynamic studies will be used not only to assess optimal ways for antibiotics to eradicate resistant pathogens, but also to investigate the ability of antibiotics to prevent the development of resistance on therapy and to eradicate pathogens from colonizing sites.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.