Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11175624›Full record

ReviewSao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina2001

Infant mortality due to perinatal causes in Brazil: trends, regional patterns and possible interventions.

C G Victora, F C Barros

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Explaining racial disparities in infant health in Brazil.American journal of public health · 2015
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Explaining racial disparities in infant health in Brazil.American journal of public health · 2013
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Cohort profile: the 2004 Pelotas (Brazil) birth cohort study.International journal of epidemiology · 2011
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH INFANT MORTALITY IN A BRAZILIAN CITY WITH HIGH HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INDEX.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

C G VictoraUniversidade Federal de Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. cvictora@zaz.com.br
F C Barros

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextBrazilian infant and child mortality levels are not compatible with the country's economic potential. In this paper, we provide a description of levels and trends in infant mortality due to perinatal causes and malformations and assess the likely impact of changing intermediate-level determinants, many of which are amenable to direct interventions through the health or related sectors. TYPE OF STUDY: Review paper.

methodsTwo main sources of mortality data were used: indirect mortality estimates based on censuses and surveys, and rates based on registered deaths. The latter were corrected for under-registration. Combination of the two sources of data allowed the estimation of cause-specific mortality rates. Data on current coverage of preventive and curative interventions were mostly obtained from the 1996 Demographic and Health Survey. Other national household surveys and Ministry of Health Statistics were also used. A thorough review of the Brazilian literature on levels, trends and determinants of infant mortality led to the identification of a large number of papers and books. These provided the background for the analyses of risk factors and potential interventions.

resultsThe indirect infant mortality rate estimate for 1995-97 is of 37.5 deaths per thousand live births, about six times higher than in the lowest mortality countries in the world. Perinatal causes account for 57 % of all infant deaths, and congenital malformations are responsible for 11.2 % of these deaths. Mortality levels are highest in the Northeast and North, and lowest in the South and Southeast; the Center-West falls in between. Since surveys of the North region do not cover rural areas, mortality for this region may be underestimated.

conclusionsA first priority for the further reduction in infant mortality in Brazil is to improve equality among regions, since the North and Northeast, and particularly rural areas, still show very high death rates. Further reductions in infant mortality will largely depend on decreasing deaths due to perinatal causes. Improvements in the coverage and particularly in the quality of antenatal and delivery care are urgently needed. Another intervention with a potential important impact on infant mortality is the promotion of family planning. Improving birth weight might lead to an 8 % reduction in infant mortality but the efficacy of available interventions is low.

Indexed as

Birth WeightBrazilCause of DeathCongenital AbnormalitiesDelivery, ObstetricFamily Planning ServicesHumansInfantInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornPerinatal CarePrenatal CarePreventive Health Services

Identifiers

PMID11175624
PMCPMC11159561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.