Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11173660›Full record

ArticlePathology oncology research : POR2000

p53 protein accumulation and p53 gene mutation in colorectal cancer.

A Nasierowska-Guttmejer, L Trzeciak, M P Nowacki, J Ostrowski

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A Nasierowska-GuttmejerDepartment of Pathology, Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Roentgena str. 5, Warsaw, 02-971, Poland.
L Trzeciak
M P Nowacki
J Ostrowski
The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PLPostgraduate School of Molecular Medicine · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparison of immunohistochemical methods for detection of protein p53 accumulation and molecular techniques for analysis p53 gene mutation in colorectal cancer is presented. Thirty eight patients were included: all underwent surgery without preoperative treatment. Sex of patients, tumor localisation, macro and microscopic type of cancer and staging according to Astler-Coller and Jass classifications were evaluated. Protein p53 accumulation was detected by the streptavidin-biotin method using DO-7 (Dako) antibody. The number of cells stained were classified semiquanititatively according to a scoring system: (-)no positive cells, (+) : 10-30% positive cells, (++) : 40-70% positive cells, (+++) : >70% positive cells. For all cancer samples, exons 5 to 9 of p53 gene were amplified from isolated genomic DNA. PCR products were subjected to single standed conformational polymorphism analysis. All product were also directly sequenced on ABI PRISM 377 apparatus using fluorescent dideoxyterminators chemistry. The protein p53 accumulation was detected in 53% (20/38), whereas p53 gene mutation was seen in 55% (21/38). Among them, 15 patients (39%) with overexpression showed mutation in exon 5-8 gene p53. Discrepancies between results were noted in 29%. In conclusion, the necessity of both methods immunohistochemical and molecular is indicated for the objective evaluation of functional and structural status of p53 gene and protein.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsGenes, p53AdultAgedBase SequenceFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedMutationPolymorphism, Single-Stranded ConformationalSequence Analysis, DNATumor Suppressor Protein p53Tumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID11173660
OpenAlexW2130666337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.