ArticlePathology oncology research : POR1996
Differential Expression of Markers in Extensive and Restricted Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH).
Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differential cell reaction upon Toll-like receptor 4 and 9 activation in human alveolar and lung interstitial macrophages.Respiratory research · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) represents a poorly defined pathologic entity characterized by diverse clinical appearence and falling into two major categories namely a restricted and an extensive disease. Since the outcome and the course of the disease is variable, we postulated that this might be reflected by the phenotype of the Langerhans cells. We have selected 11 adult restricted cases and 10 extensive childhood cases and compared the phenotype of LCH cells by immunohistochemistry on paraffin sections. Morphometric analysis indicated a significantly higher expression of histiocytic (CD68, S-100, lysozyme) markers in the adult restricted cases compared to the extensive form of the disease. Both groups were equally positive for LCH marker CD1a and negative for T cell marker CD4. On the other hand, HLA-DR expression was significantly higher in LCH cells of the extensive childhood cases suggesting higher activation. These data suggest that LCH cells have a different phenotype in the extensive childhood and restricted adult LCH where the latter is characterized by a more differentiated histiocytic phenotype.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.