Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11172490›Full record

ArticleMolecular diagnosis : a journal devoted to the understanding of human disease through the clinical application of molecular biology2000

Comparison of human telomerase reverse transcriptase messenger RNA and telomerase activity as urine markers for diagnosis of bladder carcinoma.

H Bialkowska-Hobrzanska, L Bowles, B Bukala, M G Joseph, R Fletcher, H Razvi

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular diagnosis : a journal devoted to the understanding of human disease through the clinical application of molecular biology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. An introduction to telomeres and telomerase.Molecular biotechnology · 2003
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

H Bialkowska-HobrzanskaMolecular Biology Diagnostic Laboratory, Lawson Research Institute, St. Joseph's Health Centre, University of Western Ontario, 268 Grosvenor Street, London, Ontario, N6A 4V2, Canada.
L Bowles
B Bukala
M G Joseph
R Fletcher
H Razvi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) has been identified as the catalytic subunit of telomerase ribonucleoprotein complex known to be required for cellular immortality and oncogenesis. Although human telomerase activity (hTA) is considered as a general marker for malignancy based on its presence in most malignant tumors including bladder cancer, its detection in urine is affected by many factors. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical utility of detecting urine hTERT messenger RNA (mRNA) by multiplex hTERT/GAPDH RT-PCR and urine hTA by telomerase repeat amplification protocol (TRAP) in the diagnosis of bladder cancer. METHODS AND

resultsCystoscopy urine samples or bladder washes prospectively collected from 35 patients with confirmed (35) or clinically suspected (5) transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder were examined by TRAP, hTERT/GAPDH RT-PCR, and urine cytology. The control group comprised 21 healthy volunteers and 3 patients without TCC. The hTERT/GAPDH RT-PCR test showed significantly higher diagnostic sensitivity than TRAP assay (94.3% vs 48.6%, P <.001) and urine cytology (95.2% vs 61.9%, P =.008) for confirmed TCCs. In particular, for superficial TCCs low grade (I-II), the hTERT/GAPDH RT-PCR test outperformed TRAP (90% vs 25%, P <.001) and urine cytology (91.7% vs 58.3%, P =.46). The overall specificity of the hTERT/GAPDH RT-PCR, TRAP and urine cytology was 92% (22/24), 100% (24/24), and 100% (3/3), respectively. A positive hTERT mRNA expression was also detected in urologic specimens from 3 patients with previous history of TCC, 3 to 6 months before cystoscopic evidence of cancer.

conclusionIn this pilot study, the hTERT mRNA expression in urine sediments is a more sensitive marker for diagnosis of TCC of the bladder than hTA and cytology. However, there is a higher false-positive rate.

Indexed as

RNARNA, MessengerAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Transitional CellCatalytic DomainDNA-Binding ProteinsEnzyme ActivationFemaleGlyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate DehydrogenasesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsBiomarkers, TumorDNA-Binding ProteinsGlyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate DehydrogenasesRNARNA, MessengerRNA, NeoplasmTelomerasetelomerase RNA

Identifiers

PMID11172490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.