Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11160945›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2001

Diversity arrays: a solid state technology for sequence information independent genotyping.

D Jaccoud, K Peng, D Feinstein, A Kilian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 304 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
304citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

304 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Investigating Genetic Spillage in aEcology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Genome wide association study unveils the genetic basis of Orobanche crenata resistance in pea.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

244 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

D JaccoudCenter for the Application of the Molecular Biology to International Agriculture (CAMBIA) Canberra, ACT, Australia.
K Peng
D Feinstein
A Kilian

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here we present the successful application of the microarray technology platform to the analysis of DNA polymorphisms. Using the rice genome as a model, we demonstrate the potential of a high-throughput genome analysis method called Diversity Array Technology, DArT'. In the format presented here the technology is assaying for the presence (or amount) of a specific DNA fragment in a representation derived from the total genomic DNA of an organism or a population of organisms. Two different approaches are presented: the first involves contrasting two representations on a single array while the second involves contrasting a representation with a reference DNA fragment common to all elements of the array. The Diversity Panels created using this method allow genetic fingerprinting of any organism or group of organisms belonging to the gene pool from which the panel was developed. Diversity Arrays enable rapid and economical application of a highly parallel, solid-state genotyping technology to any genome or complex genomic mixtures.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantBlotting, SouthernCloning, MolecularDNA FingerprintingDNA, PlantFluorescent DyesGene PoolGenetic MarkersGenetic VariationGenotypeOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisOryzaPhylogenyPolymorphism, GeneticReproducibility of ResultsSample SizeDNA, PlantFluorescent DyesGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID11160945
PMCPMC29632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.