Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11160916›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2001

A new method for generating point mutations in bacterial artificial chromosomes by homologous recombination in Escherichia coli.

M Lalioti, J Heath

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Convergence of DNA methylation and phosphorothioation epigenetics in bacterial genomes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. BACs as tools for the study of genomic imprinting.Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology · 2011
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M LaliotiSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK. m.lalioti@bham.ac.uk
J Heath
University of Birmingham · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs) and P1 artificial chromosomes (PACs), which contain large fragments of genomic DNA, have been successfully used as transgenes to create mouse models of dose-dependent diseases. They are also potentially valuable as transgenes for dominant diseases given that point mutations and/or small rearrangements can be accurately introduced. Here, we describe a new method to introduce small alterations in BACs, which results in the generation of point mutations with high frequency. The method involves homologous recombination between the original BAC and a shuttle vector providing the mutation. Each recombination step is monitored using positive and negative selection markers, which are the Kanamycin-resistance gene, the sacB gene and temperature-sensitive replication, all conferred by the shuttle plasmid. We have used this method to introduce four different point mutations and the insertion of the ss-galactosidase gene in a BAC, which has subsequently been used for transgenic animal production.

Indexed as

Point MutationRecombination, GeneticAnimalsBone DiseasesChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialEmbryo, MammalianEscherichia coliFemaleGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenetic VectorsHumansMiceMice, TransgenicReceptors, Fibroblast Growth FactorReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNAReceptors, Fibroblast Growth FactorRNA

Identifiers

PMID11160916
PMCPMC30415
OpenAlexW2103697052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.