ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2001
Bradykinin attenuates the [Ca(2+)](i) response to angiotensin II of renal juxtamedullary efferent arterioles via an EDHF.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lack of contribution of nitric oxide synthase to cholinergic vasodilation in murine renal afferent arterioles.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2018Article
- Connexins and gap junctions in the EDHF phenomenon and conducted vasomotor responses.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2010Review
- Endothelium-dependent smooth muscle hyperpolarization: do gap junctions provide a unifying hypothesis?British journal of pharmacology · 2004Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. Bradykinin (BK) effect on the [Ca(2+)](i) response to 1 nM angiotensin II was examined in muscular juxtamedullary efferent arterioles (EA) of rat kidney. 2. BK (10 nM) applied during the angiotensin II-stimulated [Ca(2+)](i) increase, induced a [Ca(2+)](i) drop (73+/-2%). This drop was prevented by de-endothelialization and suppressed by HOE 140, a B2 receptor antagonist. It was neither affected by L-NAME or indomethacin, nor mimicked by sodium nitroprusside, 8-bromo-cyclic GMP or PGI(2). The BK effect did not occur when the [Ca(2+)](i) increase was caused by 100 mM KCl-induced membrane depolarization and was abolished by 0.1 microM charybdotoxin, a K(+) channel blocker. 3. Although proadifen prevented the BK-caused [Ca(2+)](i) fall, more selective cytochrome P450 inhibitors, 17-octadecynoic acid (50 microM) and 7-ethoxyresorufin (10 microM) were without effect. 4. Increasing extracellular potassium from 5 to 15 mM during angiotensin II stimulation caused a [Ca(2+)](i) decrease (26+/-4%) smaller than BK which was charybdotoxin-insensitive. Inhibition of inward rectifying K(+) channels by 30 microM BaCl(2) and/or of Na(+)/K(+) ATPase by 1 mM ouabain abolished the [Ca(2+)](i) decrease elicited by potassium but not by BK. 5. A voltage-operated calcium channel blocker, nifedipine (1 microM) did not prevent the BK effect but reduced the [Ca(2+)](i) drop. 6. These results indicate that the BK-induced [Ca(2+)](i) decrease in angiotensin II-stimulated muscular EA is mediated by an EDHF which activates charybdotoxin-sensitive K(+) channels. In these vessels, EDHF seems to be neither a cytochrome P450-derived arachidonic acid metabolite nor K(+) itself. The closure of voltage-operated calcium channels is not the only cellular mechanism involved in this EDHF-mediated [Ca(2+)](i) decrease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.