Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11159427›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2001

Molecular dynamics study of peptide-bilayer adsorption.

C M Shepherd, K A Schaus, H J Vogel, A H Juffer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Peptides and Peptidomimetics for Antimicrobial Drug Design.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Molecular simulations of antimicrobial peptides.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2010
    Article
  9. Length effects in antimicrobial peptides of the (RW)n series.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2007
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

C M ShepherdStructural Biology Research Group, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4 Canada.
K A Schaus
H J Vogel
A H Juffer
University of Calgary · CAUniversity of Oulu · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two 6-ns simulations of the somatostatin analog sandostatin and a 1-palmityl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (POPC) bilayer are presented. In the first simulation, the peptide was placed in a region of bulk water density and allowed to spontaneously move toward and bind to the bilayer surface. An attractive force between the peptide and bilayer drove the binding process, which was opposed by a significant frictional force caused by the solvent (water). During the approach of the peptide toward the bilayer the area of the interacting surface between the species was inversely proportional to the distance between them, supporting the application of such a relationship in continuum calculations of peptide-bilayer binding free energies. In the second simulation, the N-terminus of the surface-bound peptide was deprotonated. Consistent with experiment, this strengthened interactions between the peptide and the bilayer. Details of both peptide-bilayer complexes, including the orientation, percent buried surface area, and orientation of the lipid headgroups are in good agreement with those obtained from experiment. The location of the different side chains in the bilayer is in direct correlation with an interfacial hydrophobicity scale developed using model peptides. The aromatic side chains of the Phe and Trp residues all lie flat with respect to the bilayer surface in both complexes. Changes in lipid and water ordering due to peptide binding suggest a possible domination of lipophobic over hydrophobic effects, as proposed by other workers. Where appropriate, peptide and lipid properties in the bound states are compared with separate simulations of sandostatin and the bilayer in water, respectively, so as to monitor the response of the system to the binding process.

Indexed as

AdsorptionBiophysical PhenomenaBiophysicsComputer SimulationIn Vitro TechniquesLipid BilayersMacromolecular SubstancesModels, MolecularOctreotidePeptidesPhosphatidylcholinesProtein BindingProtein ConformationSurface PropertiesThermodynamicsWater1-palmitoyl-2-oleoylphosphatidylcholineLipid BilayersMacromolecular SubstancesOctreotidePeptidesPhosphatidylcholinesWater

Identifiers

PMID11159427
PMCPMC1301258
OpenAlexW1964527012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.