Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11159414›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2001

Protein osmotic pressure and the state of water in frog myoplasm.

D W Maughan, R E Godt

Open access · bronzeAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

D W MaughanDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont 05405-0068, USA. maughan@salus.uvm.edu
R E Godt
Augusta University · USUniversity of Vermont · US

Funding

MICROANALYSIS OF INTRACELLULAR FLUID FROM MUSCLER01DK033833 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT &ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI MAUGHAN, DAVID WAYNE · 1986 to 1986
–
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK33833
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We measured the osmotic pressure of diffusible myoplasmic proteins in frog (Rana temporaria) skeletal muscle fibers by using single Sephadex beads as osmometers and dialysis membranes as protein filters. The state of the myoplasmic water was probed by determining the osmotic coefficient of parvalbumin, a small, abundant diffusible protein distributed throughout the fluid myoplasm. Tiny sections of membrane (3.5- and 12-14-kDa cutoffs) were juxtaposed between the Sephadex beads and skinned semitendinosus muscle fibers under oil. After equilibration, the beads were removed and calibrated by comparing the diameter of each bead to its diameter measured in solutions containing 3-12% Dextran T500 (a long-chain polymer). The method was validated using 4% agarose cylinders loaded with bovine serum albumin (BSA) or parvalbumin. The measured osmotic pressures for 1.5 and 3.0 mM BSA were similar to those calculated by others. The mean osmotic pressure produced by the myoplasmic proteins was 9.7 mOsm (4 degrees C). The osmotic pressure attributable to parvalbumin was estimated to be 3.4 mOsm. The osmotic coefficient of the parvalbumin in fibers is approximately 3.7 mOsm mM(-1), i.e., roughly the same as obtained from parvalbumin-loaded agarose cylinders under comparable conditions, suggesting that the fluid interior of muscle resembles a simple salt solution as in a 4% agarose gel.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiophysicsIn Vitro TechniquesMuscle ProteinsMuscle, SkeletalOsmotic PressureParvalbuminsRana temporariaSepharoseWaterMuscle ProteinsParvalbuminsSepharoseWater

Identifiers

PMID11159414
PMCPMC1301245
OpenAlexW1988307037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.