ArticleBiophysical journal2001
Protein osmotic pressure and the state of water in frog myoplasm.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- The logic of ionic homeostasis: Cations are for voltage, but not for volume.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- The determinants of transverse tubular volume in resting skeletal muscle.The Journal of physiology · 2014Article
- Diffusion coefficients of endogenous cytosolic proteins from rabbit skinned muscle fibers.Biophysical journal · 2014Article
- Article
- Article
- Muscle cell volume and pH changes due to glycolytic ATP synthesis.The Journal of physiology · 2007Article
- The effect of intracellular acidification on the relationship between cell volume and membrane potential in amphibian skeletal muscle.The Journal of physiology · 2005Article
- A quantitative analysis of cell volume and resting potential determination and regulation in excitable cells.The Journal of physiology · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We measured the osmotic pressure of diffusible myoplasmic proteins in frog (Rana temporaria) skeletal muscle fibers by using single Sephadex beads as osmometers and dialysis membranes as protein filters. The state of the myoplasmic water was probed by determining the osmotic coefficient of parvalbumin, a small, abundant diffusible protein distributed throughout the fluid myoplasm. Tiny sections of membrane (3.5- and 12-14-kDa cutoffs) were juxtaposed between the Sephadex beads and skinned semitendinosus muscle fibers under oil. After equilibration, the beads were removed and calibrated by comparing the diameter of each bead to its diameter measured in solutions containing 3-12% Dextran T500 (a long-chain polymer). The method was validated using 4% agarose cylinders loaded with bovine serum albumin (BSA) or parvalbumin. The measured osmotic pressures for 1.5 and 3.0 mM BSA were similar to those calculated by others. The mean osmotic pressure produced by the myoplasmic proteins was 9.7 mOsm (4 degrees C). The osmotic pressure attributable to parvalbumin was estimated to be 3.4 mOsm. The osmotic coefficient of the parvalbumin in fibers is approximately 3.7 mOsm mM(-1), i.e., roughly the same as obtained from parvalbumin-loaded agarose cylinders under comparable conditions, suggesting that the fluid interior of muscle resembles a simple salt solution as in a 4% agarose gel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.