Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11159409›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2001

Activating efficiency of Ca2+ and cross-bridges as measured by phosphate analog release.

M Yamaguchi, S Takemori

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M YamaguchiDepartment of Physiology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan. maki@jikei.ac.jp
S Takemori
Jikei University School of Medicine · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess the activating efficiency of Ca2+ and cross-bridges, the release rates of phosphate analogs from skinned fibers were estimated from the recovery of contractility and that of stiffness. Estimations were performed based on the assumptions that contractility was indicative of the population of analog-free myosin heads and that stiffness reflected the population of formed cross-bridges. Aluminofluoride (AlFx) and orthovanadate (Vi) were used as phosphate analogs with mechanically skinned fibers from rabbit psoas muscle. The use of the analogs enabled the functional assessment of activation level in the total absence of ATP. Fibers loaded with the analogs gradually recovered contractility and stiffness in normal plain rigor solution. The addition of Ca2+ to the plain rigor solution significantly accelerated their recovery, whereas ADP had no appreciable effect. ATP plus Ca2+(contracting condition) accelerated the recovery by several tens of times. These results indicate that the cross-bridges formed during contraction have prominent activating efficiency, which is indispensable to attain full activation. A comparison between the activating efficiency evaluated from stiffness and that from contractility suggested that Ca2+ is more potent in accelerating the binding of actin to analog-bound myosin heads whereas cross-bridges mainly accelerate the subsequent analog-releasing step.

Indexed as

ActinsAdenosine DiphosphateAdenosine TriphosphateAluminum CompoundsAnimalsBiophysical PhenomenaBiophysicsCalciumFluoridesIn Vitro TechniquesMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalMyosinsRabbitsVanadatesActinsAdenosine DiphosphateAdenosine TriphosphateAluminum Compoundsaluminum fluorideCalciumFluoridesMyosinsVanadates

Identifiers

PMID11159409
PMCPMC1301240
OpenAlexW2047729252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.