Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11159383›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2001

Diffusion-controlled intrachain reactions of supercoiled DNA: Brownian Dynamics simulations.

K V Klenin, J Langowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Simulation of DNA Supercoil Relaxation.Biophysical journal · 2016
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Polymer chain models of DNA and chromatin.The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2006
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

K V KleninDivision of Biophysics of Macromolecules, German Cancer Research Center, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
J Langowski

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Brownian Dynamics technique was used to model a diffusion-controlled intramolecular reaction of supercoiled DNA (2500 basepairs) in 0.1 M sodium chloride solution. The distance between the reactive groups along the DNA contour was 470 basepairs. The reaction radius was varied from 6 to 20 nm. The results are presented in terms of the probability distribution P(F)(t) of the first collision time. The general form of the function P(F)(t) could be correctly predicted by a simple analytical model of one-dimensional diffusion of the superhelix ends along the DNA contour. The distribution P(F)(t) is essentially non-exponential: within a large initial time interval, it scales as P(F)(t) approximately t(-1/2), which is typical for one-dimensional diffusion. However, the mean time of the first collision is inversely proportional to the reaction radius, as in three dimensions. A visual inspection of the simulated conformations showed that a considerable part of the collisions is caused by the bending of the superhelix axis in the regions of the end loops, where the axis is most flexible. This fact explains why the distribution P(F)(t) combines the features of one- and three-dimensional diffusion. The simulations were repeated for a DNA chain with a permanent bend of 100 degrees in the middle position between the reactive groups along the DNA contour. The permanent bend changes dramatically the form of the distribution P(F)(t) and reduces the mean time of the first collision by approximately one order of magnitude.

Indexed as

Biophysical PhenomenaBiophysicsDiffusionDNA, SuperhelicalKineticsModels, MolecularNucleic Acid ConformationThermodynamicsDNA, Superhelical

Identifiers

PMID11159383
PMCPMC1301214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.