Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11159290›Full record

ArticleArchives of disease in childhood2001

Successful implementation of spacer treatment guideline for acute asthma.

C V Powell, G R Maskell, M K Marks, M South, C F Robertson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of disease in childhood, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Inhaler devices for asthma: do we follow the guidelines?Archives of disease in childhood · 2002
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C V PowellDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Royal Children's Hospital, Flemington Road, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia. powellc@cryptic.rch.unimelb.edu.au
G R Maskell
M K Marks
M South
C F Robertson
Royal Children's Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo develop and implement an evidence based guideline for the treatment of acute asthma using a metered dose inhaler and spacer combination.

methodsDefined strategies were used for the development and implementation of a guideline, assessed by a prospective, descriptive, study using notes review, and patient, nursing, and medical staff telephone contact. The setting was a tertiary referral hospital in Victoria, Australia with 25 000 yearly admissions, and asthma accounting for about 7% of total. The first 200 children and families to use the guideline after its introduction were evaluated.

resultsA total of 191 (95.5%) children were treated according to the guideline. Six (3.0%) children were given nebulisers appropriately based on severity; five (2.5%) were given nebulisers at parental or child choice; and four (2.0 %) who did not have severe asthma, received nebulised treatment inappropriately.

conclusionsSuccessful implementation of a new evidence based guideline can be achieved using specific strategies for promoting the application of research findings in the clinical arena.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAcute DiseaseAdministration, InhalationAdolescentAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaChildChild, PreschoolEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleNebulizers and VaporizersAnti-Asthmatic Agents

Identifiers

PMID11159290
PMCPMC1718656
OpenAlexW2101786016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.