Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11158743›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2001

Dosage-dependent antifungal efficacy of V-echinocandin (LY303366) against experimental fluconazole-resistant oropharyngeal and esophageal candidiasis.

V Petraitis, R Petraitiene, A H Groll, T Sein, R L Schaufele, C A Lyman, A Francesconi, J Bacher, S C Piscitelli, T J Walsh

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Antifungal pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2014
    Review
  4. Tissue penetration of antifungal agents.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2014
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Comparison of echinocandin antifungals.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2007
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of echinocandins.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2004
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Anidulafungin.Drugs · 2004
    Article
  14. Article
  15. New model of oropharyngeal candidiasis in mice.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2001
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

V PetraitisImmunocompromised Host Section, Pediatric Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
R Petraitiene
A H Groll
T Sein
R L Schaufele
C A Lyman
A Francesconi
J Bacher
S C Piscitelli
T J Walsh
Cancer Institute (WIA) · INNational Institutes of Health · USOffice of Research Services · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

V-echinocandin (VER-002; LY303366) is a semisynthetic derivative of echinocandin B and a potent inhibitor of fungal (1, 3)-beta-D-glucan synthase. We studied the antifungal efficacy, the concentrations in saliva and tissue, and the safety of VER-002 at escalating dosages against experimental oropharyngeal and esophageal candidiasis caused by fluconazole-resistant Candida albicans in immunocompromised rabbits. Study groups consisted of untreated controls, animals treated with VER-002 at 1, 2.5, and 5 mg/kg of body weight/day intravenously (i.v.), animals treated with fluconazole at 2 mg/kg/day i.v., or animals treated with amphotericin B at 0.3 mg/kg/day. VER-002-treated animals showed a significant dosage-dependent clearance of C. albicans from the tongue, oropharynx, esophagus, stomach, and duodenum in comparison to that for untreated controls. VER-002 also was superior to amphotericin B and fluconazole in clearing the organism from all sites studied. These in vivo findings are consistent with the results of in vitro time-kill assays, which demonstrated that VER-002 has concentration-dependent fungicidal activity. Esophageal tissue VER-002 concentrations were dosage proportional and exceeded the MIC at all dosages. Echinocandin concentrations in saliva were greater than or equal to the MICs at all dosages. There was no elevation of serum hepatic transaminase, alkaline phosphatase, bilirubin, potassium, or creatinine levels in VER-002-treated rabbits. In summary, the echinocandin VER-002 was well tolerated, penetrated the esophagus and salivary glands, and demonstrated dosage-dependent antifungal activity against fluconazole-resistant esophageal candidiasis in immunocompromised rabbits.

Indexed as

Amphotericin BAnidulafunginAnimalsAntifungal AgentsCandidiasisCandidiasis, OralDrug Resistance, MicrobialEchinocandinsEsophageal DiseasesEsophagusFemaleFluconazoleImmunosuppression TherapyPeptides, CyclicPharyngeal DiseasesRabbitsAmphotericin BAnidulafunginAntifungal AgentsEchinocandinsFluconazolePeptides, Cyclic

Identifiers

PMID11158743
PMCPMC90315
OpenAlexW2118583744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.