ReviewProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2001
Polycystic kidney disease: In danger of being X-rated?
Review in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A new conceptual framework for PKD1 in ADPKD; integrating DNA structures and inflammation.BMC nephrology · 2026Review
- G-quadruplex stabilization provokes DNA breaks in human PKD1, revealing a second hit mechanism for ADPKD.Nature communications · 2025Article
- On the Many Actions of Ouabain: Pro-Cystogenic Effects in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Review
- Novel role of ouabain as a cystogenic factor in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2013Review
- ADPKD: molecular characterization and quest for treatment.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2005Review
- Therapeutic potential of antisense oligonucleotides as modulators of alternative splicing.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2003Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.