ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2001
Clonal relationships among Shigella serotypes suggested by cryptic flagellin gene polymorphism.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- ShigaPass: anMicrobial genomics · 2023Article
- Serological cross-reaction between O-antigens of Shigella dysenteriae type 4 and an environmental Escherichia albertii isolate.Current microbiology · 2013Article
- Family outbreak of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O123:H-, France, 2009.Emerging infectious diseases · 2010Article
- Can the fliC PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism technique replace classic serotyping methods for characterizing the H antigen of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli strains?Journal of clinical microbiology · 2006Article
- Expression and characterization of flagella in nonmotile enteroinvasive Escherichia coli isolated from diarrhea cases.Infection and immunity · 2002Article
- Enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus (ERIC)-PCR analysis as a reliable evidence for suspected Shigella spp. outbreaks.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The presence of cryptic fliC alleles in the genomes of 120 strains representative of the four Shigella species was investigated. One fragment was obtained by PCR amplification of fliC, with a size varying from 1.2 to 3.2 kbp, depending on the species or serotype. After digestion with endonuclease HhaI, the number of fragments in patterns varied from three to nine, with sizes of between 115 and 1,020 bp. Patterns sharing most of their bands were grouped to constitute an F type. A total of 17 different F types were obtained from all strains included in this study. A unique pattern was observed for each the following serotypes: Shigella dysenteriae 1, 2, 8, and 10 and S. boydii 7, 13, 15, 16, and 17. On the contrary, S. dysenteriae serotype 13 and S. sonnei biotype e were each subdivided into two different F types. S. flexneri serotypes 3a and X could be distinguished from the cluster containing S. flexneri serotypes 1 to 5 and Y. S. flexneri serotype 6 clustered with S. boydii serotypes 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 11, 14, and 18 and S. dysenteriae serotypes 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, and 12. Two other clusters were outlined: one comprising S. dysenteriae serotypes 3, 12, 13 (strain CDC598-77), 14, and 15 and the other one joining S. boydii serotypes 5 and 9. None of the 17 fliC patterns was found in the fliC HhaI pattern database previously described for Escherichia coli. Overall, this work supports the hypothesis that Shigella evolved from different ancestral strains of E. coli. Moreover, the method outlined here is a promising tool for the identification of some clinically important Shigella strains as well as for confirmation of atypical isolates as Shigella spp.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.