Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11158114›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2001

Diagnosing genital ulcer disease in a clinic for sexually transmitted diseases in Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

S M Bruisten, I Cairo, H Fennema, A Pijl, M Buimer, P G Peerbooms, E Van Dyck, A Meijer, J M Ossewaarde, G J van Doornum

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Infections caused byClinical microbiology reviews · 2024
    Review
  2. Timely Diagnosis of Incubating Syphilis Infections Using Treponema pallidum Transcription-Mediated Amplification Assay.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Herpes simplex virus type 1 is the leading cause of genital herpes in New Brunswick.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2012
    Article
  11. Article
  12. TprK gene regions are not suitable for epidemiological syphilis typing.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2009
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The laboratory diagnosis of Haemophilus ducreyi.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2005
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

S M BruistenGG&GD, Regional Laboratory of Public Health, Nieuwe Achtergracht 100, 1018 WT Amsterdam, The Netherlands. sbruisten@gggd.amsterdam.nl
I Cairo
H Fennema
A Pijl
M Buimer
P G Peerbooms
E Van Dyck
A Meijer
J M Ossewaarde
G J van Doornum
GGD Amsterdam · NLInstituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most common etiologic agents of genital ulcer disease (GUD) are herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), HSV-2, Treponema pallidum, and Haemophilus ducreyi. In an outpatient clinic for sexually transmitted diseases in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, specimens from 372 patients with GUD were collected from February to November 1996. Sera were collected at the time of the symptoms and, for most patients, also during follow-up visits. Swabs in viral transport medium were used for HSV culture and for detection of DNA. The most prevalent pathogen found was HSV-2, which was detected by culture in 35% of the patients and by PCR in 48% of the patients. Also, HSV-1 infection was more often detected by PCR (7.8%) than by culture (5.6%). Evidence for an active infection with T. pallidum was found in 1.9% of the patients, using serological tests. A multiplex PCR for simultaneous T. pallidum and H. ducreyi DNA detection was positive for T. pallidum in 3.3% of the samples and for H. ducreyi in only 0.9% (3 out of 368) of the samples. The sensitivity of the PCR was superior to that of culture for HSV detection and to that of serology for T. pallidum detection. Specific H. ducreyi immunoglobulin G antibodies were detected in sera of 5.2% of the patients, with no concordance between serology and PCR. In 37% of the cases, none of the tested microorganisms was detected. Performance of PCR in addition to conventional techniques significantly improved the diagnosis of GUD.

Indexed as

ChancroidCommunity Health ServicesFemaleHaemophilus ducreyiHerpes GenitalisHerpes SimplexHerpesvirus 1, HumanHerpesvirus 2, HumanHumansMaleNetherlandsPolymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySexually Transmitted DiseasesSpecimen Handling

Identifiers

PMID11158114
PMCPMC87783
OpenAlexW2128940332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.