Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11157787›Full record

ArticleGenome research2001

Prediction of the archaeal exosome and its connections with the proteasome and the translation and transcription machineries by a comparative-genomic approach.

E V Koonin, Y I Wolf, L Aravind

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 106 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
106citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

106 citing papers in PubMed, 247 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Archaeal RNA processing and regulation: expanding the functional landscape.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Affinity Proteomic Analysis of the Human Exosome and Its Cofactor Complexes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2020
    Article
  12. Enzymatic Analysis of Reconstituted Archaeal Exosomes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2020
    Article
  13. Microbial genome analysis: the COG approach.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2019
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E V KooninNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20894, USA. koonin@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Y I Wolf
L Aravind
National Institutes of Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By comparing the gene order in the completely sequenced archaeal genomes complemented by sequence profile analysis, we predict the existence and protein composition of the archaeal counterpart of the eukaryotic exosome, a complex of RNAses, RNA-binding proteins, and helicases that mediates processing and 3'->5' degradation of a variety of RNA species. The majority of the predicted archaeal exosome subunits are encoded in what appears to be a previously undetected superoperon. In Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum, this predicted superoperon consists of 15 genes; in the Crenarchaea, Sulfolobus solfataricus and Aeropyrum pernix, one and two of the genes from the superoperon, respectively, are relocated in the genome, whereas in other Euryarchaeota, the superoperon is split into a variable number of predicted operons and solitary genes. Methanococcus jannaschii partially retains the superoperon, but lacks the three core exosome subunits, and in Halobacterium sp., the superoperon is divided into two predicted operons, with the same three exosome subunits missing. This suggests concerted gene loss and an alteration of the structure and function of the predicted exosome in the Methanococcus and Halobacterium lineages. Additional potential components of the exosome are encoded by partially conserved predicted small operons. Along with the orthologs of eukaryotic exosome subunits, namely an RNase PH and two RNA-binding proteins, the predicted archaeal exosomal superoperon also encodes orthologs of two protein subunits of RNase P. This suggests a functional and possibly a physical interaction between RNase P and the postulated archaeal exosome, a connection that has not been reported in eukaryotes. In a pattern of apparent gene loss complementary to that seen in Methanococcus and Halobacterium, Thermoplasma acidophilum lacks the RNase P subunits. Unexpectedly, the identified exosomal superoperon, in addition to the predicted exosome components, encodes the catalytic subunits of the archaeal proteasome, two ribosomal proteins and a DNA-directed RNA polymerase subunit. These observations suggest that in archaea, a tight functional coupling exists between translation, RNA processing and degradation, (apparently mediated by the predicted exosome) and protein degradation (mediated by the proteasome), and may have implications for cross-talk between these processes in eukaryotes.

Indexed as

Genome, ArchaealProtein BiosynthesisTranscription, GeneticAdenosine TriphosphatasesAmino Acid SequenceArchaeal ProteinsCysteine EndopeptidasesEvolution, MolecularExoribonucleasesGene OrderMolecular Sequence DataMultienzyme ComplexesOperonProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexRibonucleasesRNA-Binding ProteinsAdenosine TriphosphatasesArchaeal ProteinsCysteine EndopeptidasesExoribonucleasesMultienzyme ComplexesProteasome Endopeptidase Complexribonuclease PHRibonucleasesRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA Helicases

Identifiers

PMID11157787
PMCPMC311015
OpenAlexW1995557066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.