Trial reportPituitary2000
Immunohistochemical evaluation of the post-translational processing of chromogranin A in human pituitary adenomas.
Trial report in Pituitary, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterization of the EM66 Biomarker in the Pituitary and Plasma of Healthy Subjects With Different Gonadotroph Status and Patients With Gonadotroph Tumor.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2019Article
- Characterization and plasma measurement of the WE-14 peptide in patients with pheochromocytoma.PloS one · 2014Article
- The extended granin family: structure, function, and biomedical implications.Endocrine reviews · 2011Review
- Immunohistochemical properties of silent corticotroph adenoma and Cushing's disease.Pituitary · 2007Article
- Chromogranin a processing in human pituitary adenomas and carcinomas: analysis with region-specific antibodies.Endocrine pathology · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chromogranin A (CgA), pancreastatin (PST), intervening-peptide (IP) and WE-14 antisera were employed to investigate the proteolysis of CgA in 50 pituitary adenomas. All non-functioning (NF) pituitary tumours (n = 28) exhibited CgA immunoreactivity. PST, IP and WE-14 immunostaining was observed in 85%, 89% and 67%, respectively. CgA, PST and IP immunostaining were comparable in the majority of NF tumours, while less intense WE-14 immunoreactivity was detected in a subpopulation of NF tumour cells. Approximately half of the functioning pituitary tumours expressed CgA immunoreactivity. Six of nine ACTH-secreting tumours displayed CgA and IP immunostaining; four of these tumours displayed PST immunoreactivity. WE-14 immunoreactivity was detected in one corticotroph tumour. Three of six growth hormone (GH) secreting tumours displayed CgA immunostaining, two exhibited PST and IP, and one exhibited WE-14 immunoreactivity. Clusters of WE-14 immunopositive cells were detected in one GH tumour. One of seven prolactinomas exhibited weak CgA immunostaining, while weak IP and WE-14 immunostaining was detected in an additional tumour. No PST immunostaining was detected in prolactinomas. Therefore CgA is a valuable marker of NF pituitary tumours, however it is a more sporadic marker of functioning adenomas. In general, the cellular pattern and intensities of CgA, PST and IP immunoreactivity were comparable in the majority of pituitary adenomas. In contrast, WE-14 immunostaining was observed in a subpopulation of tumour cells. The pathophysiological significance of the proteolysis of CgA to generate bioactive peptides in both NF and functioning pituitary adenomas remains to be established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.