Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11141494›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of pathology2001

Molecular cytogenetic comparison of apocrine hyperplasia and apocrine carcinoma of the breast.

C Jones, S Damiani, D Wells, R Chaggar, S R Lakhani, V Eusebi

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of pathology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Apocrine lesions of the breast.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2022
    Review
  3. Rare Breast Cancer Subtypes.Current oncology reports · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The changing role of pathology in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment.Pathobiology : journal of immunopathology, molecular and cellular biology · 2011
    Review
  8. Non-operative breast pathology: apocrine lesions.Journal of clinical pathology · 2007
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The enigmatic nature of apocrine breast lesions.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2006
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

C JonesBreast Molecular Pathology Group, Department of Histopathology, Royal Free and University College Medical School, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
S Damiani
D Wells
R Chaggar
S R Lakhani
V Eusebi
University College London · GBLudwig Cancer Research · GBLudwig Cancer Research · BEOspedale Bellaria · ITUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationship of apocrine metaplasia to invasive breast cancer is controversial. Different authors have reported that apocrine differentiation in proliferative lesions may be a risk factor, a precursor lesion, or have no association with malignancy. The aim of this study was to compare the genetic alterations in benign apocrine hyperplasia with apocrine ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive apocrine carcinomas of the breast using comparative genomic hybridization. The mean number of alterations in apocrine hyperplasia was 4.1 (n = 10) compared to 10.2 in apocrine DCIS (n = 10) and 14.8 (n = 4) in invasive carcinoma. The most common alterations in apocrine hyperplasia were gains of 2q, 13q, and 1p and losses of 1p, 17q, 22q, 2p, 10q, and 16q. Apocrine DCIS and invasive carcinomas showed gains of 1q, 2q, 1p, and losses of 1p, 22q, 17q, 12q, and 16q as their most common DNA copy number changes. Apocrine hyperplasia is considered to be a benign lesion and its relationship to invasive carcinoma remains unclear. Our data suggest that some apocrine hyperplasias may be clonal proliferations. The mean number of alterations are lower in apocrine hyperplasia, however the changes show considerable overlap with those identified in in situ and invasive apocrine carcinoma. These alterations are also commonly seen in nonapocrine breast cancer. The data are consistent with apocrine hyperplasia as a putative nonobligate precursor of apocrine carcinoma.

Indexed as

ApolipoproteinsGlycoproteinsMembrane Transport ProteinsAdultAgedApocrine GlandsApolipoproteins DCarrier ProteinsChromosome AberrationsCytogenetic AnalysisDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansHyperplasiaImmunohistochemistryMaleAPOD protein, humanApolipoproteinsApolipoproteins DCarrier ProteinsGlycoproteinsMembrane Transport ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2Receptors, AndrogenReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID11141494
PMCPMC1850273
OpenAlexW2022169113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.