Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11141142›Full record

SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2001

Cholesterol reduction and non-illness mortality: meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.

M F Muldoon, S B Manuck, A B Mendelsohn, J R Kaplan, S H Belle

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013 · on this map
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011 · on this map
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Regulation of monoamine transporters and receptors by lipid microdomains: implications for depression.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2018
    Review
  9. How lipids may affect risk for suicidal behavior.Journal of psychiatric research · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Dental manifestations in bariatric patients: review of literature.Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB · 2009
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Statin adverse effects : a review of the literature and evidence for a mitochondrial mechanism.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2008
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M F MuldoonCenter for Clinical Pharmacology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA 15260, Pittsburgh, USA. mfm10_@pitt.edu
S B Manuck
A B Mendelsohn
J R Kaplan
S H Belle

Funding

Substrates of Threat and Reward Sensitivity and CVD RiskP01HL040962 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI ERICKSON, KIRK I · 1988 to 2022
$31.1M
SUPPLEMENT EFFECTS OF CHOLESTEROL REDUCTION ON BEHAVIORR01HL046328 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MULDOON, MATTHEW F · 1992 to 2001
$777k
NHLBI NIH HHS HL40962NHLBI NIH HHS HL46328NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL040962
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the association between cholesterol lowering interventions and risk of death from suicide, accident, or trauma (non-illness mortality).

designMeta-analysis of the non-illness mortality outcomes of large, randomised clinical trials of cholesterol lowering treatments. STUDIES REVIEWED: 19 out of 21 eligible trials that had data available on non-illness mortality. INTERVENTIONS REVIEWED: Dietary modification, drug treatment, or partial ileal bypass surgery for 1-10 years.

main outcome measureDeaths from suicides, accidents, and violence in treatment groups compared with control groups.

resultsAcross all trials, the odds ratio of non-illness mortality in the treated groups, relative to control groups, was 1.18 (95% confidence interval 0.91 to 1.52; P=0.20). The odds ratios were 1.28 (0.94 to 1.74; P=0.12) for primary prevention trials and 1.00 (0.65 to 1.55; P=0.98) for secondary prevention trials. Randomised clinical trials using statins did not show a treatment related rise in non-illness mortality (0.84, 0.50 to 1.41; P=0.50), whereas a trend toward increased deaths from suicide and violence was observed in trials of dietary interventions and non-statin drugs (1.32, 0.98 to 1.77; P=0.06). No relation was found between the magnitude of cholesterol reduction and non-illness mortality (P=0.23).

conclusionCurrently available evidence does not indicate that non-illness mortality is increased significantly by cholesterol lowering treatments. A modest increase may occur with dietary interventions and non-statin drugs.

Indexed as

AccidentsAdultAgedAnticholesteremic AgentsChi-Square DistributionCholesterol, DietaryFemaleHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsHypercholesterolemiaJejunoileal BypassMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRegression AnalysisAnticholesteremic AgentsCholesterol, DietaryHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID11141142
PMCPMC26598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.