Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11136747›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2001

Rapid detection of smear-negative Mycobacterium tuberculosis by PCR and sequencing for rifampin resistance with DNA extracted directly from slides.

M Patnaik, K Liegmann, J B Peter

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis detection, Latvia.Emerging infectious diseases · 2005
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M PatnaikResearch Department, Specialty Laboratories, Inc., Santa Monica, California 90404, USA. mpatnaik@specialtylabs.com
K Liegmann
J B Peter
Specialty Materials (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional methods for identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from culture can take 6 weeks. To facilitate the rapid detection of M. tuberculosis and to assess the risks of drug resistance, we developed a technique of eluting DNA directly from sputum slides and performing PCR for the detection of M. tuberculosis DNA, followed by sequencing the rpoB gene to detect rifampin resistance. This entire process requires only 48 h. Forty-seven sputum specimens submitted for microscopy for detection of acid-fast bacilli (AFB) and for mycobacterial culture and susceptibility testing were assessed after elution from the slides and extraction. M. tuberculosis-specific DNA was amplified in a nested PCR with previously described primers (primers rpo95-rpo293 and rpo105-rpo273), followed by analysis on a 4% agarose gel for a 168-bp product. Automated sequencing was performed, and the sequences were aligned against a database for detection of anomalies in the rpoB gene (codons 511 to 533) which indicate rifampin resistance. Of the 47 sputum specimens tested, 51% (24 of 47) were culture positive (time to positive culture, 2 to 6 weeks). Smears for AFB were positive for 58% (14 of 24) of the specimens and were negative for 42% (10 of 24) of the specimens. All 24 culture-positive sputum specimens (14 microscopy-positive and 10 microscopy-negative sputum specimens) were positive by PCR with eluates from the smears. Forty-nine percent (23 of 47) of the sputum specimens were negative for M. tuberculosis by smear, culture, and PCR. Of the isolates from the culture-positive samples, five were rifampin resistant by sequencing; all five were also rifampin resistant by in vitro susceptibility testing. Of these rifampin-resistant M. tuberculosis isolates, two were microscopy negative for AFB. Patients who are negative for AFB and culture positive for M. tuberculosis can now be identified within a day, allowing institution of therapy and reducing isolation time and medical costs.

Indexed as

Antitubercular AgentsCulture MediaDNA, BacterialDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesDrug Resistance, MicrobialHumansMycobacterium tuberculosisPolymerase Chain ReactionRifampinSequence Analysis, DNASpecimen HandlingSputumTuberculosis, PulmonaryAntitubercular AgentsCulture MediaDNA, BacterialDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesRifampin

Identifiers

PMID11136747
PMCPMC87678
OpenAlexW1984486728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.