ReviewClinical cardiology2000
The future of antiplatelet therapy: optimizing management in patients with acute coronary syndrome.
Review in Clinical cardiology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Guidelines for the acute coronary syndromes.Current cardiology reports · 2001Guideline
- The contribution of genetic factors to thrombotic and bleeding outcomes in coronary patients randomised to IIb/IIIa antagonists.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2002Trial
- Species Differences in Platelet Protease-Activated Receptors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Preparation and characterization of acetylsalicylic acid/chitosan nanoparticles and its antithrombotic effects.Designed monomers and polymers · 2018Article
- Synergism of aspirin and heparin with a low-frequency non-invasive ultrasound system for augmentation of in-vitro clot lysis.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the past few years, the antiplatelet armamentarium has been markedly enriched. With the intravenous platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and the new thienopyridine clopidogrel, the options for acute and chronic antiplatelet therapy have expanded. Future therapies will optimize the application of these agents. For example, in percutaneous coronary intervention, it appears that patients may benefit by loading with an adenosine diphosphate receptor blocker before the procedure and may well benefit indefinitely from continuation of this therapy. Patients with aspirin resistance or the P1A2 single nucleotide polymorphism that is common in the population may derive particular benefit from dual antiplatelet therapy. Similarly, patients who present with unstable angina while receiving chronic aspirin therapy and those with involvement of more than one atherosclerotic bed deserve consideration for dual antiplatelet therapy. New applications will be facilitated by point-of-care testing for platelet biology and genotyping, pharmacogenomics, and protection from inflammation in patients with serologic evidence of elevated markers, such as C-reactive protein. Indeed, even with the recent explosion of relevant data and enriched therapeutic choices, we are just beginning to understand the optimal application of these therapies to the appropriate clinical indications and patient groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.