Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11129122›Full record

ReviewDrugs2000

The treatment of respiratory pseudomonas infection in cystic fibrosis: what drug and which way?

D Banerjee, D Stableforth

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. CombattingAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. A decade of antimicrobial resistance trends inFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Impact ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Review
  14. Polymyxin Delivery Systems: Recent Advances and Challenges.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D BanerjeeDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Bordesley Green East, England.
D Stableforth
Heartlands Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a non-capsulate and non-sporing gram-negative bacillus that most commonly affects the lower respiratory system in humans. Burkholderia (previously Pseudomonas) cepacia has emerged as an important respiratory pathogen in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). The ability of P. aeruginosa to persist and multiply in moist environments and equipment, such as humidifiers in hospital wards, bathrooms, sinks and kitchens, maybe of importance in cross-infection. P. aeruginosa infections of the lower respiratory tract can range in severity from colonisation (without an immunological response) to a severe necrotising bronchopneumonia. Infection is seen in patients with CF and other chronic lung diseases such as non-CF bronchiectasis. In patients with CF, once P. aeruginosa is established in the airways it is almost impossible to eradicate, but prior to this, aggressive treatment can delay the development of chronic infection. 30 to 40% of the present paediatric population with CF will have chronic pseudomonal infection. B. cepacia has a particular predisposition to infect patients with CF and may be distinguished from P. aeruginosa by accelerated lung disease in about one- third of patients. Overwhelming septicaemia and necrotising pneumonia are well described (cepacia syndrome); events that are rare with P. aeruginosa. With the propensity for social cross-infection, segregation policies have been accepted as means of controlling outbreaks. A number of antipseudomonal agents are available. The most commonly used are the extended-spectrum penicillins, aminoglycosides, cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, polymixins and the monobactams. An aminoglycoside with a beta-lactam penicillin is usually considered to be the first line treatment. No trial has shown any significant clinical advantage of any particular combination regimen over another. The emergence of resistance continues to be a concern. Pipericillin, piperacillin/tazobactam and meropenem have good but equivalent antibacterial activity against P. aeruginosa. However, B. cepacia is characterised by in vitro resistance to colistin (colomycin), aminoglycosides and ciprofloxacin but better susceptibility to ceftazidime. Nebulised delivery of antipseudomonal antibiotics is thought to prevent recurrent exacerbations, reduce antibiotic usage and maintain lung function, particularly in patients with CF. Colistin, tobramycin and gentamicin are currently the most commonly prescribed nebulised antibiotics. Much effort is directed at treating chronic P. aeruginosa infection but as chronic infection is seldom if ever eradicated when first established, prevention is preferable. Early intensive treatment for P. aeruginosa infection is advocated in order to maintain pulmonary function and postpone the onset of chronic P. aeruginosa infection.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCystic FibrosisDrug Resistance, MicrobialHospitalizationHumansLungNebulizers and VaporizersPseudomonas aeruginosaPseudomonas InfectionsRespiratory Tract InfectionsAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID11129122
OpenAlexW2055741709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.