Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11126358›Full record

ArticleOncogene2000

A comparative evaluation of beta-catenin and plakoglobin signaling activity.

B O Williams, G D Barish, M W Klymkowsky, H E Varmus

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Pathogenesis of Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2015
    Review
  11. Nuclear signaling from cadherin adhesion complexes.Current topics in developmental biology · 2015
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Plakoglobin: role in tumorigenesis and metastasis.International journal of cell biology · 2012
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

B O WilliamsNational Cancer Institute, Division of Basic Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
G D Barish
M W Klymkowsky
H E Varmus
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNational Cancer Institute · USNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

NIGMS NIH HHS GM54001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vertebrates have two Armadillo-like proteins, beta-catenin and plakoglobin. Mutant forms of beta-catenin with oncogenic activity are found in many human tumors, but plakoglobin mutations are not commonly found. In fact, plakoglobin has been proposed to suppress tumorigenesis. To assess differences between beta-catenin and plakoglobin, we compared several of their biochemical properties. After transient transfection of 293T cells with an expression vector encoding either of the two proteins, soluble wild type beta-catenin does not significantly accumulate, whereas soluble wild type plakoglobin is readily detected. As anticipated, beta-catenin is stabilized by the oncogenic mutation S37A; however, the analogous mutation in plakoglobin (S28A) does not alter its half-life. S37A-beta-catenin activates a TCF/LEF-dependent reporter 20-fold more potently than wild type beta-catenin, and approximately 5-fold more potently than wild type or S28A plakoglobin. These differences may be attributable to an enhanced affinity of S37A beta-catenin for LEF1 and TCF4, as observed here by immunoprecipitation assays. We show that the carboxyl-terminal domain is largely responsible for the difference in signaling and that the Armadillo repeats account for the remainder of the difference. The relatively weak signaling by plakoglobin and the failure of the S28A mutation to enhance its stability, may explain why plakoglobin mutations are infrequent in malignancies.

Indexed as

Trans-ActivatorsZebrafish Proteinsbeta CateninCell LineCytoskeletal ProteinsDesmoplakinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, Neoplasmgamma CateninHumansLymphoid Enhancer-Binding Factor 1Point MutationProtein BindingProtein Structure, TertiaryProto-Oncogene ProteinsRecombinant Fusion Proteinsbeta CateninCTNNB1 protein, humanCytoskeletal ProteinsDesmoplakinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, Neoplasmgamma CateninLEF1 protein, humanLymphoid Enhancer-Binding Factor 1Proto-Oncogene ProteinsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsTCF7L2 protein, humanTCF Transcription FactorsTrans-ActivatorsTranscription Factor 7-Like 2 ProteinTranscription FactorsWnt ProteinsZebrafish Proteins

Identifiers

PMID11126358
OpenAlexW2319577974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.