ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2000
Clinical value of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies.
Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- A girl with microscopic polyangiitis: an unexpected clinical course with long-term follow-up.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2005Article
- Lessons from animal models of vasculitis.Current rheumatology reports · 2000Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article presents a brief review of the clinical value of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) in the diagnosis and management of patients with various forms of vasculitis. ANCA assay methodology and testing recommendations are reviewed. The patterns of reactivity of ANCA observed by indirect immunofluorescence, the antigens recognized by ANCA, and the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of ANCA for diagnosis of different vasculitides are described. In addition, the spectrum of drugs and nonvasculitic diseases that are associated with ANCA and need to be differentiated from true ANCA-positive vasculitides are reviewed. When properly utilized and cautiously interpreted, ANCA are a useful, noninvasive diagnostic tool in the differential diagnosis of vasculitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.