Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11123040›Full record

ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2000

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.

P Boulos, G Ioannidis, J D Adachi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Green tea polyphenols attenuate deterioration of bone microarchitecture in female rats with systemic chronic inflammation.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2011
    Article
  4. Synergistic effects of green tea polyphenols and alphacalcidol on chronic inflammation-induced bone loss in female rats.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2010
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

P BoulosSt. Joseph's Hospital, McMaster University, 501 - 25 Charlton Avenue E, Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 1Y2, Canada.
G Ioannidis
J D Adachi
McMaster University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article attempts to evaluate the results of several recently published clinical trials of drugs used in the treatment and prevention of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Despite our lack of understanding regarding the biological mechanisms that lead to glucocorticoid-induced bone loss, effective therapy has been developed. Bisphosphonates have demonstrated significant treatment benefits and should be considered the therapy of choice for both the treatment and prevention of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.

Indexed as

CalcitoninCalcium CompoundsDiphosphonatesFemaleFluoridesGlucocorticoidsHumansMaleOsteoporosisPrognosisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeVitamin DCalcitoninCalcium CompoundsDiphosphonatesFluoridesGlucocorticoidsVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID11123040
OpenAlexW3192572262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.