Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11123022›Full record

ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports1999

Crystal-induced inflammation and cartilage degradation.

G M McCarthy

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current rheumatology reports, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Osteoarthritis gene therapy.Gene therapy · 2004
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

G M McCarthyHonorary Senior Lecturer, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St. Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past year, there have been advances in our understanding of the induction of cartilage damage by calcium-containing crystals. Mechanisms of deposition and the biologic effects of crystals have been further characterized, as has the interaction between crystals and leukocytes. Studies of the clinical diagnosis of crystal deposition diseases suggest that accuracy with microscopy needs to be enhanced. Normal values for serum NTPPPHase have been established and optimal diagnostic imaging strategies for calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease have been suggested. There are still no available drugs to inhibit deposition or effect reabsorption of calcium-containing crystals.

Indexed as

CalcinosisCalcium PhosphatesCartilage, ArticularCrystallizationFemaleHumansKnee JointMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleOsteoarthritisPrognosisRisk AssessmentSensitivity and SpecificitySeverity of Illness Indexalpha-tricalcium phosphatecalcium phosphatecalcium phosphate, dibasic, anhydrouscalcium phosphate, monobasic, anhydrousCalcium Phosphatestetracalcium phosphate

Identifiers

PMID11123022
OpenAlexW1975598277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.