Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11122820›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2000

Prodrug/drug sensitivity gene therapy: current status.

W R Smythe

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

W R SmytheThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Box 80, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prodrug strategy has its own particular real and theoretic obstacles. Clinical strategies and research efforts have tried to approach these problems. The bystander effect, whereby nontransduced cells are affected by simple proximity to those that have received the novel gene, has enabled many prodrug systems to be more efficient than anticipated. Several prodrug gene therapy systems have been developed, including the HSVtk/GCV and CD/5-FC systems. Preclinical work serves as the foundation for clinical trials examining the use of prodrug gene therapy systems. At least 21 prodrug gene therapy trials have been approved for patient enrollment in the United States and Europe. Recent work has demonstrated the success of prodrug gene therapy, which might lead to combination therapies using vector transfer of both prodrug/suicide as well as immune-enhancing genes to tumors.

Indexed as

Genetic TherapyClinical Trials as TopicCombined Modality TherapyHumansNeoplasmsProdrugsResearch DesignProdrugs

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.