Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11122755›Full record

ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2000

Electron beam tomography as an endpoint for clinical trials of antiatherosclerotic therapy.

P Raggi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

P RaggiEBT Research Foundation, 224 Lauderdale Road, Nashville, TN 37205, USA. praggi@attglobal. net

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current antiatherosclerotic therapies are highly effective and have induced a factual reduction in morbidity and mortality related to atherosclerotic disease. This makes it difficult for clinical researchers to demonstrate a further reduction in hard events. On the other hand, angiographic studies have conclusively demonstrated that coronary artery disease regression can be used as a valid surrogate endpoint. In fact, small improvements in luminal diameter stenosis corresponded to a substantial reduction in event rates. However, because coronary angiography is invasive and expensive, other surrogate endpoints may be more desirable to ascertain the effectiveness of therapy. With electron beam tomography imaging the coronary artery tree is visualized noninvasively and vascular calcification, a marker of atherosclerotic disease, is easily detected and its extent quantified. Preliminary studies have shown that this technology provides an opportunity to serially monitor the effectiveness of medical therapy for coronary artery disease at low cost and low risk for the patient.

Indexed as

Tomography, X-Ray ComputedAnimalsAnticholesteremic AgentsCalcinosisCalciumClinical Trials as TopicCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CareAnticholesteremic AgentsCalcium

Identifiers

PMID11122755
OpenAlexW1979731361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.